Cold approach is a lone wolf fantasy imo. Outta approaching 100 women you get maybe 1-3 lays/success's. (if you're not retarded)

Yes, but you can fuck her multiple times. So if you approach 100 girls and fuck 3 of those girls 10 times each, that's one fuck per 3 approaches.

You try to use social context to your advantage dating in ecosystems like Uni. or clubs. But then I feel like "DaT GuY". Cause I don't like being around people much it's a lot of bullshit. Guess get over it.

ok, so you hate social game

My thought process: Ideally you cold approach outside your ecosystems. And build slow leads inside your ecosystems to find a good prospect.

ok...

Online dating is a dumpster fire. Its not real life. People act very differently IRL. Most of the woman either all have the same generic profile or goth/liberal chick who wants me to have a tramp stamp. I switched my profile to be labeled as a woman for 5 mins and had 20 likes. ITS CRAZY.

OLD is awful, yes

But at the end of all the work it's the women your left with.

right

I don't trust women with marriage.

Marriage is a one sided providership contract to give her a cushy retirement at your expense.

And even in LTRs when you're not there they're flirting with other guys for attention. I've had good looking girls with decent guys give me sexual attention. I know its not cheating but if I saw my gal acting like that i'd be disgusted.

right

The problem:

So i'm left with casual dating women the rest of my life. No marriage. maybe have a LTR here and there but... It's gonna get harder and harder the older I get.

It's certainly going to get harder to fuck 20 year olds after 45, yes

It's weird cold approaching in your late 30s and 40s and 50s. Im 20 so i can pass off as the young stupid guy.

It's only weird because you make it weird

How da hell do I keep this up? assuming i take care of my body to be physically attractive. Do I just end up single and alone around 40? Do I just give in a find a LTR at 40?

Well, it's easy at 40. It's harder at 50 for sure.

I'm just going be a normal guys who has his own place with generic normal salary. At some point i become 40 year old guy who's still single.

I'm uncertain of the future with todays modern landscape. Because alot of women are like scorpions and i'm playing frogger.

Well, your options are nothing, or keep it casual, or open long term relationships with multiple women (my preferred), or monogamy.

Your post though, amounts to "all my options suck".

And I feel you. We all feel you. But it reads like you are suddenly shocked that you're not going to marry a virgin and you are not going to get the 1940's horny housewife dream.

What does that leave....... well, choose from the above. Varying amounts of casual to monogamy, avoid marriage, and find fulfilment where you can in life.

I feel that hollywood glamorizes the eternal bachelor lifestyle. I'm not a rich guy backed by the script.

money doesn't help

I'm a normal guy who dosen't trust the institution of marriage and the women i'd be signing it with.

good.

stop being normal, start being amazing.

I feel my only option is to get lucky and find a good gal someday.

This is not going to happen until you make it happen.

You find a great girl by being a great guy AND LEARNING HOW TO DATE.

Even a great girl will shit test and play all the same shit. At least a little bit. She's not going to be impressed with your neo-virginal "waiting for miss right".

But i'd really just be compromising. I feel extremely vulnerable when i'm committed to a woman.

Right, and you really are.

How are you guys doing?

Facing the same shit you are, except in my case I've accepted it more than you have.

This "Minor Youtuber" might not even exist - and more importantly, who cares. It's a crappy short story/intro to hook interest with dubious detailed (why list the state where this minor youtuber lives?). The point that "he's losing his career" applies to a billion men around the globe.

This whole thing looks sounds like "be a good provider".

Look...... never count on a woman to stand by you or even stick around. Women are loyal to themselves and to a lesser extent their children and to an even less extent their pussies AND THAT'S IT. Not to any man and not to you. The closest to loyalty that you can hope for is that she'll stick with you while you are her best option.

Men are loyal. Women are loyal to themselves.

The bottom line is this:

• be in control of your life.
• If you don't own something and can't control that thing, then don't invest in it because it is not yours and it will not pay dividends.

This applies to friends, this applies to possessions, this applies to material things, and most of all this applies to women.

You own your body, your life, your career and your stuff. You do not own women and you don't own relationships.

This whole "women will / should stand by a man with this list of qualities" is trying to bring back the 1950's.

Sorry my dude, that ship has sailed and that ship has sunk.

This guy seems at best purple pilled. It is red pilled in as much as it says women get with men because of hypergamy but then all it talks about is the usefulness of men to women as providers. So you stay with a guy who will be earning more later because of a temporary hiccough but if its a guy you just don't like then bin him, but only if its the most profitable thing for you to do.

Sounds like the advice the girls would give. What new insight does he bring?

I honestly think that men and women and their relationships should be more than purely transactional. On one hand, I am forever reminding women that they should not lose sight of transaction -that they do need to bring real value to a man's life -beyond occasional sex- not just derive value from him. However, when the whole of the value of someone becomes what is gained in a transaction, then you have taken away all the really good stuff. There is no reservoir of affection of belief in the other person, only the bank balance you have paid in. A spouse is not a credit bank. A spouse should be someone who is there for you.

To some extent you and your spouse need to have a pact that you are there for them for better or worse. Looking at stuff only from the end of transaction is a way to end up with very unhappy women in the long term. If you are a net recipient (like almost all women are) and you are still only looking at what you can receive, you bring absolutely nothing to the table but a hole that gradually dries. It is in women's interests to cultivate the notion of for better or worse. Come the wall, if you have not got a guy to buy into this and proven it to him for a decade or so, you are headed to a very hard place.