Welcome to The Hub. This is our welcoming tribe dedicated to introducing yourself, meeting new people, and learning about new tribes.
All women are secretly sluts. Tattoos or not. It's just a matter of the right guy bringing the slutiness out of them.
In terms of tattoos, think about them as a reflection of the woman's thirst for attention. If a woman has many colorful, complex tattoos in overt places, then she most likely needs a lot of attention. That will almost always come back to bite her boyfriend in the ass, because she will eventually seek sexual attention from other guys. Those types of women should strictly be used for sexual pleasure, nothing more.
On the other hand, women who have a couple of simple, meaningful, discreet tats are generally less inclined to be attention seeking.
@Typo-MAGAshiv I don't think that can work. You can find videos of fire plough techniques but I think they need very dry warm conditions and they also seem to be done by cultures where the guys are huge and can bring a lot of force onto the wood.
@MentORPHEUS this seems familiar, but I can't think of where I heard this, and Google is no help
@Mate1212 to be a cuckold, one has to be in a relationship.
Why on earth would a man with any self-respect grant or remain in a relationship with a woman who would do that to him? (weird fetishists aside)
Have you read the sidebar?
Is the book worth reading though?
Beats me. Like I told someone else a while back, I got so sick of carnold's constant spamming of that book that I refuse to even give it a chance.
@SeasonedRP I didn't see it until I was a teenager. My brothers and I saw it on Comedy Central.
@First-light ah, OK. When you had said "rubbing of sticks", I had envisioned taking a stick in each hand, holding them perpendicular to each other, and rubbing.
Something I've never seen work IRL.
Does a tattoo always mean that a woman is bad or is secretly a slut or untrustworthy?
No.
Like anything, context matters.
There's a lot of anti-tattoo sperginess in the manosphere, but not all tattoos are bad. I was always OK with them as long as they were unique and meaningful, and not so many that she looked like a circus freak.
I'll put it this way: my wife and I both have a little ink, and we can both easily hide it under ordinary clothes. And the worst two mega-sluts from my past were both ink-free.
Tattoos and their absence can clue you in on someone, but they aren't end-all, be-all, and again, the context matters.
@Typo-MAGAshiv Well the bow drill is a lot easier and I was including it in the more than a dozen woods I have used. But the hand drill does work and I have made it work. Its a lot harder in damp northern climates though.
You need to consider perhaps having a harder drill than the fireboard and certainly a longer and thinner one than the bow drill. A very little pine resin on the hands lets you transmit more pressure to the drill. Also the right bit of fungus in the notch can help (though that is perhaps a cheat too and one should master it without). A good tip for a hand drill fireboard is one with exactly the right amount of decay in it. Decay leaves nitrates and free radicals and they smoulder easier.
The string is the thing that makes the bow drill feel like a cheat. Making it work with self made natural string is much harder. Raw hide softened with fat is not bad but that is not for a survival situation because it requires some sourcing and preparation. Natural fibre strings spun by hand do not last long and you need to be really competent in stick choice for that. The bow drill is quite easy in most conditions but like any tool, it takes practise. The action of the bow drill is the easy bit to learn, the important bit is to be able to walk in the woods and break off (break off not pick up in almost all cases) the right sticks to just knock one up in 5 minutes with your bootlace (which is cheating but you do usually have one).
Read More

