RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
His discussions did not include people who were led to addiction by their doctors,
Dude, I was in a position of listening to all three hours of his radio show, every day, for literally half a decade. Therefore, I can say with certainty: Rush did NOT, I mean not fucking once EVER, clarify, caveat, offer exceptional or outlier cases, that could in any way get even perceived as "diluting/softening" his hard-line positions on issues, particularly that of drugs. Even "legal" pharmaceuticals, he stood hard for the for-profit model, and vilified every other alternative as "socialized medicine, a slippery slope directly to full Communist takeover of the USA."
So yes, he was HARD in favor of the status quo that financially incentivizes doctors, hospital systems, and pharmaceutical companies, to push pills for money, and fuck all the guardrails around those with abuse potential. And, he wasn't just speaking in a vacuum. He was nationally syndicated, with an audience of tens of millions, who called themselves "Dittoheads" which as repeated on-air meant "I love you and completely agree with and believe everything you say!"
Thus, he modeled ideas, behaviors, and attitudes for the entire American Right Wing culture. His platform and positions, therefore held a symbiotic relationship with the culture and positions of law enforcement up to and including Federal agencies (classic example Chief Darryl Gates saying publicly, "Casual drug users ought to be taken out and SHOT!"), legislative bodies therefore the drafting, enactment, and enforcement of drug laws and literally tens of millions of dollars per year budgeted for interdiction and enforcement activities.
For my part, I was closely involved with the "legalize hemp/cannabis" movement, therefore a ground level soldier intimately involved in the "Drug War," Immersed in it personally, not a casual pundit on the sidelines with no more skin in the game than agreeing with a fat fuck radio host.
SO, for one of THE. TOP. players in the entire 2 decade drug war vertical industry and legislative machine, who in service of this position expressed the harshest possible treatment of OTHER drug users, to carve out a personal exception, and to selectively do the opposite of the entire corpus of his expressed position on the entire thing, is COMPLETELY out of the fucking question. When it came down to him personally, "falling victim" to the same human foibles and weaknesses he spent literally thousands of hours condemning others for; he deserves ZERO compassion, mercy, empathy, and other such things he also condemned personally, and claimed belonged to his ideological opposites, "The Left", when it suited him and the entire breadth and height of his hard line positions on drugs and their users.
Read MoreIt's funny because feminists have spent decades emasculating men, while masculine men refused to bow down to the feminist demands of superiority. They refuse to marry the beta males, and refuse to be submissive to the masculine men, so they end up alone and crying about where have all the good men gone. There is no third option. Prince Charming doesn't exist.
She could start by taking the gold boogers out of her nose.
This is a sign that things have actually come a long way. The author does not fully understand the concept of hypergamy but she does know it exists.
He answer to hypergamy is -hypergamy. Well of course, what else is a girl to do? The solution is more masculine men, the cream of the crop of current men are masculine enough, that is what a girl wants. That's right love, that's hypergamy.
I do wonder what most women would do with a more masculine man with more testosterone? Those qualities of drive, energy, strength, focus, courage decisiveness and so on that she admires can be turned towards a woman -usually in acquisition- but they are primarily the man's. Such a man has less need of a woman, more options, less need to please her, more desire to go out and find adventure, less fear of letting her know he is displeased. Its not likely to result in him taking her shopping more at weekends anyway. One doubts more manly men would be voting for as much feminism and free shit to be given out as weak men.
Read MoreIf you don't want to slog through this nonsense, a simple breakdown: "Women can't be blamed for their preferences because they're historically oppressed AND it's natural for her to demand things from men. There are plenty of outliers of ordinary looking men with hot wives, so all fault must lie with lazy men."
Ironically, right underneath the article is clickbait to keep you on the page: "Glen Powell Proves Masculinity Is Hot" with a 6' actor next to Sydney Sweeney. It's amusing that feminists HATE her because she's conventionally pretty and not an old hag with multiple face piercings.
This is a good time to ruminate on how we may feel tempted to express pity towards leftover women who express despair about their situation when they've had zero empathy for men their entire lives.
Read MoreOn that day, it really won't help to have a lot of useless tattoos that looked a bit better on a young body that everyone wanted but which are now saggy and dated. If that was her hand, what other delights will her (now scarcer) lovers see?
@SwarmShawarma A women is a lot safer walking down an dark alley than a man.
Ideally, always make a woman go first into a socially dangerous situation. It has been the way in some cultures, a post wall one is ideal. No one wants to kill someone else's mother in law, in fact no one wants to do anything to or with her except return her as all she can be to them is a resource drain.
Women need to be wary of dangerous men they get into bed with. Men need to fear strangers and bad acquaintances and they need to fear them a lot more than women need to fear anything.
This is what it feels like when you haven't visited trp.red in a while:
It is not volume of speech, but precision of character, that commands respect.
If that's the facial expression she wears as (I assume) one of the oldest women in that night club, it's no surprise she can't attract any interest.
