Random Thought - Saturday Edition:

We need to dispense with the 1-10 rating system. There are really only 4 levels.

Level 1 (1-3 on the 10 point rating scale)

If you on this level, date on this level. Get over it. We all have issues and this is one of yours. If you are a woman who is an objective 3, do NOT look down on a 1. You’re the fucking same as him, lady. Just don’t be a bitch on top of being only a 3. Also, ditch the hair coloring. It is clearly not working.

Level 2 (4-6 /10)

See above. Plus - Do NOT date down to Level 1. Stay in your lane. If you bang a 3 and you are a 4, you are ruining everything for everyone. Stop. You are being a dick to society. We hate you.

Level 3 (7-9 /10)

No dating down, and no dating up. You are level 3, thank the universe and your God for landing here. You hit the genetic lottery, shut the fuck up and sit down. And if you are a 9 and think you’re better than a 7 - NO THE FUCK YOU ARE NOT! You arrogant fuckwad. If you get caught doing this, you will be excommunicated from the dating market. In fact, many of you women on Level 3 “Cant’ find a good man” So BOOM. We warned you. Get cats and box wine and cope.

Level 10

You cannot place yourself here. Society will do that and you already know it. You are likely famous or garner MASSIVE amounts of attention. This is going to ruin your psyche for life. Enjoy the bits of life that come easy, and shut up about it. If you ever feel hated, or get hate mail, or posts, it is because you dated below your level. You Already have ACCESS TO OTHER 10’s YOU GREEDY BITCH/BASTARD. We hate you too, but only if you date 8 or below. We can forgive you for the occasional 9. Take the leeway and don’t be a dick about it.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Dr. Disturbed

@SwarmShawarma Yes the experiments need to be re -run. I can't recall but that experiment was re-run a number of times with some variations and there was always the same results. I inadvertently did it with gerbils when i was a boy. They bred faster than I could sell or re-home them and in the end it went just like mouse utopia and they all died.

I would love to re-run it with limited immigration in one universe. I would also like to start with a gene pool that was considered large enough to keep a mouse breed stable. I would also like to run a couple of dystopias -like where a cat or a boy with an air rifle was let in to persecute the mice from time to time or where there might also be floods and food shortages. One could have a control utopia with an adequate gene pool, a mild dystopia with mild immigration and mild culling (preferably of the less able like with cats or crows) and a serious dystopia where the population might even go through the odd bottle neck and at the end be set on by an equal each universe's members could be tested by a mass immigration.

It would be interesting not only to look at survival but also at the quality of mice created -who can run mazes faster, who can defend territory from a large immigration, who is better mentally adjusted in over populated conditions, who lives longer. I think a lot of interesting things could be looked at.

@adam-l and Typo The thing about the old left was that it wanted re-distribution that had a measure of fairness behind it. Without the worker the industrial revolution that gave everyone a better life would not have happened but when that revolution was at its height, the essential workers were not getting fair recompense and lived far worse than the peasants in the countryside (no means of self support like cottage gardening, filthy sometimes cholera filled water, tiny cold houses, 12+ hour days, industrial accidents...

The left had some moral basis and some of its work has benefited all "common men" today. Then the left stopped talking about giving a fair share where it was due and made universal "rights" that actually did the opposite of give what was fair and due. They took from the workers who had earned and gave to those who had not contributed like women, cripples, the lazy and the dysfunctional (those who are good cases for human charity but who should not fair better by right than those who carry them).

The left is morally bankrupt and in the end this will ruin them but they still seem to think they have the moral high ground and the establishment (which has self interestedly leaned left because the trend for the last century has been left) backs this. We will defeat the left because it is morally bankrupt but it won't be tomorrow.