RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
I don't know enough about lennon to really comment on that
I can see your point
I still think it's a bit apples and orange though
Typo claimed that Lennon was "a piece of shit" for several reasons. One was that he was a communist while rich, which he saw as hypocritical.
I tried to evoke his personal status, to make the point that it is no moral crime having a discrepancy between your personal life and your ideology.
Typo doesn't really need to answer for his personal choices in order to have a credible gender theory.
The main problam, as I see it, is that while Typo gives himself a slack (correctly) and denies giving the same slack to others (Lennon in this case), he can't acknowledge that.
That's all.
It's unclear in the thread what your original point was since the only reply it spawned from was "as for me" and not discussion about marriage
Archwinger is also on his second marriage. So there is a lot of nuance to bring that up
What was your original point?
I'm not claiming i consistency of his conduct, and of course I'm not idiot (nor rude) enough to really suggest that he divorces.
if he was thoroughly red pilled, told men not to get married, and then got married anyway
Not even this would be "hypocritical" or "inconsistent." Archwinger is a case in point.
The idea is that you can have an idea about what's "right" or "ideal" but not apply it in your personal life. That's because there are different levels of organisation, ranging from the molecular to the global, and ideas for one don't transfer neatly to the other. (In addition, of course, to the issue of preconditions not met).
As another example, there were some billionaires a while back that collectively asked "tax us more". They were grasping that the tax exemption of the ultra-rich is destroying the foundations of the society on which their very wealth depended. They didn't just "give away their wealth" - that would be stupid. They were arguing for a systemic change, not a one-off, impressive act of philanthropy.
Similarly, you can argue that it's stupid for men to get married, but your personal situation (in the case of marriage, mainly the want of children as an existential issue) make it so that you do marry yourself. There's no "contradiction" here, because ideology and life don't perfectly align.
Read MoreThey aren't useless.
You:
1) need a very good prenup lawyer
2) it can't be so utterly good that a court perceives it as too unfair or triggers some kind of foolish 'duress' ruling (e.g. she FELT like she HAD to sign it or he wouldn't get married)
Courts are more likely to uphold prenups if a woman had legal representation when she signed it and you've covered your bases legally
The less it looks like she signed the paper without understanding it, the more likely courts are to uphold most of it
I know, it's fucking stupid that an adult woman can willingly sign a document and not have to follow the contract but you unfortunately have to take as many steps as possible to remove the court's infantilization of her out of the picture and demonstrate she knew exactly what she was doing
Read MoreI'm still not understanding how that is relevant
If you don't understand how women work when you get married, and then you realize it was not a good move to make, and the only way out is to willingly lose tons of your shit, I don't see how it somehow reflects a hypocrisy to warn unmarried men who were lucky enough to find TRP while single not to get married
I'm sure a lot of married RP guys would have left their marriages by now if their finances and kids weren't on the line
I'm failing to see the hypocrisy or inconsistency in his stance. It would be another story if he was thoroughly red pilled, told men not to get married, and then got married anyway
Or if he was thoroughly red pilled, got married despite knowing the risks, them quarterbacked afterwards
(And you've probably just witnessed a philosophical argument made in about the fewest words in history).
@Vermillion-Rx they are not.
Like being born a capitalist and adopting a socialist ideology.
That's the whole point I'm trying to make.
All this crap about “stolen land” is patently false:
The original 13 colonies were taken away from England - the original colonizers. The founding fathers forcibly took the land, labor and capital away from the king and literally gave it to the people. So, NOT stolen (at least by us)
Also - per this table, 71% (almost everything other than the original 13 colonies) was purchased, annexed voluntarily, or negotiated as a part of a deal with the original colonizers.
Next time you hear this shit, shut it down.
@Typo-MAGAshiv I’ve always wondered why prenups are even a thing when they barely work. It’s like a fart in the wind. Completely useless, and it kinda stinks.
