Updates about TRP and the Community

I don’t like writing posts that sound like begging for money, and if you’ve been following my work for any length of time you’ll know that among the red pill gurus that come and go in this sphere, I’m one of the few that has not really attempted in any big way to monetize my work.

I’ve always believed in the freedom of information. The exchange of this information has been such a high priority to me, I’ve cultivated a community on Reddit, two independent websites (the development and continued hosting, funded entirely by me), and a number of offshoots on various platforms.

The meat and potatoes of my work (both written and curated) has always been free and available. In fact- a lot of “gurus” just collect my work, repackage it and try to sell it for $$$, but you can get it all for free if you just follow my work.

That said, this is time consuming, and in some cases, actually quite costly. Our membership on TRP.RED has done a phenomenal job self-funding at least some of our hosting costs, which has brought our platform into ad-free status. Which is nice, because the ads sucked.

However, in the next few weeks / months, we are planning on growing our space and releasing more content, projects, and some very entertaining things. And you might want to learn about it. (You can if you subscribe to the patreon!)

These things cost money to fund, and suck up a lot of my time. I would like to be able to do more for the community and I’m able to do so with a little extra financial freedom.

Subscribe to Patreon

So I’m going to pimp my Patreon here. Before you unsubscribe from my substack- don’t freak out! You won’t have to expect to receive updates like this coming into your mailboxes that often. My news & updates will primarily be posted on Patreon. So Make sure you subscribe over there to stay apprised.

Exclusive news (and early access) about the upcoming projects are available to paid subscribers and I gotta tell you, it’s going to be a fun Summer for TRP.

I will always continue posting my essays on Substack, TRP.red, and /r/theredpill, largely free, for my audience. Writing for me is cathartic and if it helps you on your journey it’s time well spent. However, I am going to introduce one big change to the substack:

New Posts will be able to be previewed early on Patreon before they appear elsewhere, and occasionally there will be subscriber-only posts that can only be read as Patreon subscribers.

(Sidenote: I’ve looked into hooking up stripe on substack and it just doesn’t seem like a great option for privacy, at least right now).

Additionally, I don’t usually do a lot of one-on-one coaching. My forte has always been curating and broadcasting information. However, in the case that somebody does want to reach me for one-on-one, I am introducing a tier on the patreon (LTR) that’s outrageously priced but will indeed get you one-on-one advice and discussion. It’s expensive because I only plan to offer this to an exclusive few. I am not starting a bootcamp online school for the boys, but I am offering a few select slots for immediate access directly to me if you truly desire it.

Check out the new tiers and subscribe today!

View Post on Substack

#trpnews #devnews #typoisagayhomobutyoualreadyknowthat

@Lionsmane8 Largely agreed, except I wouldn’t count on salvation from BRICs. I chuckle that Russia and China remind me of the Feudalism of Europe’s past that many escaped to the Americas for “freedom” but, as you observe, free labor is inferior to slaves and indentured servant immigrants. Nonetheless, getting a Social Credit tattoo watching your every move when you eat rice is like the serfs of Europe who literally didn’t have a bucket to pee in but yet had more religious holidays off than a modern office worker.

Speaking of that: Jason Pargin complained that The Matrix could use a refresh reboot but I disagree. Neo being in the “apex of humanity” in 1999 appears amusingly prescient: Just before 9/11, we had the internet, still could get office jobs that could pay for a home, and could get on a plane with a cup of coffee in our hand. I had fond memories of that very year. Nonetheless, there was a feeling of existential angst that it was all on a decline. I presume you felt that as well. It was no longer Mad Max apocalypse vibes of the 80’s, but rather just a slow decline like being on a morphine drip.

The left corrupted everything they touched: improved standard-of-living for working class whites transformed into scapegoating whites. Environmentalism became fretting about plastic straws while welcoming the third world to have large families with thousands of disposable diapers per month going into dumpsters, and so on. Science was transformed into Global Warming cult hysteria.

On the right, they regarded “intervention” and “pandering” as evil and preferred to just, as the old joke goes, “the light bulb changes itself”. Just don’t tax the rich and everything would be ok. “You can be rich someday if you work hard and get to keep more of your money!” Everyone was encouraged to think that if they could win the lottery, they’d get to keep their winnings so what’s the problem?

It says a LOT that the Republican party is now not comprised of the “haves” and the wealthy but rather working class men who have nowhere else to go because the left openly scapegoats them and the left tries to have “focus groups” to see if they can appeal to men but can’t break away from their “men stink” message. How to better tell men how they hate them so they’ll get our votes?

youtu.be/5KsMlpqhLdg

@adam-l

I had seen this move towards "rediscovering traditionalism" a few years back, and warned that TRP should keep the "historical memory" of why traditionalism never did cut it. It's basically outlined in Esther Vilar's The Manipulated Man. You still got a nagging, rather than a satisfied wife. And then you couldn't even get rid of her.

AMEN

The Left... They tried to harness and coopt women's natural restlessness and inability to conform to any notion of civilization, in order to supposedly undermine Capitalism.

Refer to what I replied to @First-light

"The Left" in America and in the rest of the world means two different things. For you it means sponsoring fags and welfare queens, for the rest of the world, it means hunger strikes to force capitalists to raise wages and improve worker conditions.

As it turned out, Capitalism was much more in position to take advantage of the female characteristics, namely excessive consumption and a constant discontent that drove men towards an unattainable ideal of the super provider-Chad (the mythical Alpha provider), essentially towards exhaustion and jadedness.

And that's exactly what it did.

Capitalists subverted the very rational Workers movements and morphed them into fag factories. And Capitalists leveraged female greed, vanity and entitlement to cement consumer culture and the perpetual chase of "ECONOMIC GROWTH" fueled by undersexed Men looking for sexual access.

Capitalists bought the State and placed women in a privileged social class where they benefit from traditional male chivalry, male thirst, corporate preferences and state protection.

As for Men, turn them into worker ants until we figure out this AI thing.

@First-light

Its crap for everyone in the end, guys not getting any, girls not getting much and most never getting the big chad husband they think they deserve thanks to the media.

Yup, small correction: "most never getting the RICH big chad husband".

So Chads have to go through large numbers to get some, and Brads (rich or not) get nothing, even when they commit. Only bills and nagging.

Incidentally, does Muslim Chad have a name?

Good point. I don't think so. Why don't you suggest something.

I didn't get it wrong about the left. They did mess things up. They started to legalize to fuck the patriarchy up and push women forward at the expense of men.

That's what you don't get. I think the mismatch is due to our respective paradigms. In The "Left" means two different things depending on where you are from. In our parts of the world (including a large chunk of the whole world, even in the west), "Leftists" are rugged Chads that organized Labor strikes and Hunger strikes until finally capitalists started paying living wages and governments legislated basic things like healthcare and education (which I know you don't have, how sad). But in the dystopian America, "Leftists" means blue hair welfare moms and fags. Big difference.

The people that pushed women up at the expense of men are again the capitalists. The purpose is to double the workforce and drive wages down.

Who else will pay their huge bills for promoting homosexuality and handing out free period products to all women? Paying maternity leave, paying for single mother and so on and so on. For the left the captialist is a cow. They want to keep him and milk him dry.

Again, you guys keep falling for the tricks Capitalists, WANT a privileged class made up of Women. They f'ed up the social hierarchy: they've placed themselves at the top (the 0.001%) then placed women, all women, just beneath them, and men at the bottom as expendable LABOR.

Don't forget, the state is not taxing the Uber Rich, it is taxing the Middle Class and the SMEs. Again, it is to destroy them and consolidate power at the very top.

Capitalists OWN the State.

@Lionsmane8

The left won but at what cost to women?

Nah, you got it totally wrong. Capitalists won.

I had seen this move towards "rediscovering traditionalism" a few years back, and warned that TRP should keep the "historical memory" of why traditionalism never did cut it.

It's basically outlined in Esther Vilar's The Manipulated Man. You still got a nagging, rather than a satisfied wife. And then you couldn't even get rid of her.

The Left... They tried to harness and coopt women's natural restlessness and inability to conform to any notion of civilization, in order to supposedly undermine Capitalism. What they ended up with is wiping themselves out, in the chaos and irrationality that women induced in their ranks. (And I'm speaking from experience...)

As it turned out, Capitalism was much more in position to take advantage of the female characteristics, namely excessive consumption and a constant discontent that drove men towards an unattainable ideal of the super provider-Chad (the mythical Alpha provider), essentially towards exhaustion and jadedness.

Not only the working class, but with women as the battering ram, they managed to bring down the middle class as well.

@Lionsmane8 Interesting explanation of what is happening in your country. I totally get it. Its crap for everyone in the end, guys not getting any, girls not getting much and most never getting the big chad husband they think they deserve thanks to the media.

Incidentally, does Muslim Chad have a name? We have Tyrone the African American incarnation but what is the Muslim Chad equivalent?

I didn't get it wrong about the left. They did mess things up. They started to legalise to fuck the patriarchy up and push women forward at the expense of men.

What you say about capitalism is true in many more developing countries. I have seen it a lot in sub saharan africa.

The left has got cosier with capitalism these days in the west too. Who else will pay their huge bills for promoting homosexuality and handing out free period products to all women? Paying maternity leave, paying for single mother and so on and so on. For the left the captialist is a cow. They want to keep him and milk him dry. The communist model where the state owned it all failed. They now want a new model where the state takes most of it from large corporations that are easy to tax and are regulation compliant.

@polishknight

When a leftist starts their spiel.

Again, there is no left, no right, there is only the haves and have-nots.

Socialists (and by extension marxists) from a past generation correctly identified the problem: concentration of capital into fewer and fewer hands and degrading conditions for Labor.

When I see a poor, working poor, unstable middle class and even upper middle class Americans rail against "socialism" and "communism" (without understanding what these terms mean), I just cringe at the ignorance.

Unless you are a rich asset holder with significant assets under your name, championing US-style vulture capitalism is just stupid.

Socialism is (still is in developed parts of the world like Scandinavian nations and China) about protecting the Labor class (i.e. anyone that works for a living) from exploitation.

Please understand Ameridumb bros: unless you have money and assets working you, you are Labor. And Labor in modern management theory is an EXPENSE that is to be MINIMIZED to maximize PROFITS and SHAREHOLDER VALUE.

Which means, FUCK YOUR LIFE, you do not matter, if it costs less to use Bangladeshi child/slave labor, then they'll fire all of you, close shop and move operations. And still, if it costs less to use robots, they'll fire those and replace them with robots.

So wages are now in a free fall, a race to the bottom, with the marketplace flooded with both Men AND women competing for ever diminishing wages, shrinking quality jobs, rising living costs and obscene expansion of the money supply (inflation, which benefits ASSET HOLDERS, NOT YOU), Machines and Artificial Intelligence.

Labor Unions in all countries understood that, they also understood that they could leverage their critical position and numbers to negotiate better terms, better wages and better conditions, or they'll stop producing and hurt the bottom line.

But the Ameridumb, swallowed the blue pill of the oligarchs and started railing at "commies", "socialists", "leftists". And now, you have the total obliteration of the Middle Class on a global scale.

I really can't wait for the BRICS-led world order to finally consolidate power. We need a system reset.

Dinner dates are NOT traditional. It's meal whoring. Traditional is having dinner at a woman's house chaperoned by her parents. And so on. It means stepping back 400 years and evaluation everything, like some sort of Papal conclave.

Yup. Traditional means different things for different societies/cultural/ethnic/religious groups, but definitely not what this new breed of entitled greedy narcissists understand it to be: which is "more for me, at your expense".

@Lionsmane8 I thought this as well and love to point it out to both sides: When a leftist starts their spiel, I inform them that my coal miner union great-grandfathers would have beaten the snot out of them. Socialism originally was about empowering working class beta white guys and now the left panders to the crony capitalists and transforms the west into the 3rd world instead of making the USA more like Sweden (ABBA era).

On the right, it's about being rich or powerful. As Richard Cooper puts it, become the 5% and then you can bang single mothers and sluts all you like. Being a mere decent human being increasing means little or, worse, it puts a target on your back.

It's still POSSIBLE to be a decent human being AND respected for being successful, but remarkably difficult and, as a cheesy line from Picard to Data on Star Trek put it: You can not make a single mistake and still lose. That's life.

It's time for the west to step back and ponder the mistakes it as made, cut bail, and abandon cherished progressive notions that many conservatives have now defined as "traditionalism". Dinner dates are NOT traditional. It's meal whoring. Traditional is having dinner at a woman's house chaperoned by her parents. And so on. It means stepping back 400 years and evaluation everything, like some sort of Papal conclave.