MentORPHEUS
8 hours ago
@sigdeff "If a women is in a cold room she would tell you that she felt cold, {snip} she wants you to solve the problem for her..."
True in the broader female social matrix. Make sure you recognize the difference in the specific case when your woman is behaving deferentially toward you by bringing her captain her problem, not her solution. Cynically expecting her to perform like a man in this case could cause you to derail what was potentially heading for a healthy Captain/First Mate dynamic.
Seeing women in general act helpless to get any/all men around them to pull their weight with no reciprocity is one of the more conspicuous RP truths that can't be unseen. Frustrating, but don't mix it up with someone willing to be a properly submissive partner.
GayLubeOil
10 hours ago
@Bukharin I skimmed it. If you want to see the arguments of the dissident right articulated in a clear intelligent way this is probably the book to order under someone else's name with a gift card
GayLubeOil
13 hours ago
@destraht have you read Imperium it's the book that the main character of that movie gets radicalized by
adam-l
14 hours ago
@redpillschool this is a notion applicable when you take stock, figuring out where you are. In the dynamics of politics, though, 1st) "we"s change constantly, and 2nd) the potential "we" is much larger.
Women have an inherent commonality of interest. Men don't. Or rather, they didn't when they thought females had some higher quality. Now that's becoming clear that female nature is certainly nothing to give your life over, one could envision a much larger male commonality of interest. "Fight for our wives" sounds much more dignified than "fight for our thots", but it's all thots and ex'es now. All this is on the visionary level, or course, and there are a lot of pragmatic problems, but you cannot do high-level politics without a vision.
GayLubeOil
15 hours ago
@sigdeff Stanley Millgram and Stanford Prison are behaviorists and are blind to linguistic structure. They look at power impossion as a binary, and yes they do agree that wielding symbolic authority (phallus) is castrating to the wielder.
What they miss and the subsequent divergence with Zizek/Lacan is that the most effective imposition of power utilizes ironic distance aka Obscene Father. Anyone who's read me knows the importance I place on ironic distance. It's what allows me not come across as a self rightous blowhad like the rest of the Manosphere.
This is an important point for the Red Pill because the Red Pill isnt used to thinking about language and how a command is delivered. The Red Pill are binary spergs which is why they need a theory of language more than anything.
Now whether they are capable of understand a theory of language is another question. A subset of them are which why their here.
Read MoreGayLubeOil
15 hours ago
@itiswr1tten dismissing Nationalism via Dunbar number is stupid. It's a symptom of a bourgeois who comprehends the world only through Exchange Value and quantity and is blind to Use Value and Quality.
itiswr1tten
15 hours ago
We're using the corporate concept of Dunbar's Number on civilization now?
Dunbar applies in the sense that numbers larger than this generally require more restrictive rules, laws, and enforced norms to maintain a stable, cohesive group. I'm not following your point
redpillschool
17 hours ago
@adam-l All you have to ask yourself is this: When you say "we," who is included in that we?
If those people said "we," would you be included in theirs?
