The Aging Career Women Copium of a Male Biological Clock

When I was reading up on an aging woman’s argument saying that men’s fertility doesn’t improve with age either (see image) I knew it was a dishonest comparison so I ran some numbers. Young women should be educated on this because the inspins may try to drag them down into the crab bucket.

First, let’s review women’s numbers: The most significant would be Down’s syndrome.
Google: “birth defects by age of mother” The risk of birth defects increases with the age of the mother, especially chromosomal disorders like Down syndrome: 

Age Chance of Down syndrome 20 1 in 1,480 25 1 in 1,250 30 1 in 940 35 1 in 353 40 1 in 85

Total increase in risk between age 30 to 40, 11X or 1000%

OK, what about us men? archive.ph/jb5Wo Men’s Health: How Old is Too Old to Be a Dad? “In a Baylor College of Medicine review, the researchers crunched the numbers on 86 congenital problems linked to older fatherhood.” These figures are scary, but one wonders if they fail to control for the age of the mother. It’s like saying that the passengers of drunk drivers are as likely to die in car crashes if they are drinking as well.

“What’s more, autism rates rise from 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 174 for kids whose dads had them after age 40.”

I tried to google that study but couldn’t find it. One wonders though how many fathers over 40 are having children with 20 year old women for the study to be relevant. Also, how many women over 40 are having children with 20 year old men? On average, the father will be older than the mother statistically about 5 years or so hence these figures appear to predict such ratios.

The Men’s Health article further refers to a Nature article: The average 30-year-old dad passes on about 55 mutations to his offspring, according to a paper published in Nature. But each year you age increases that number by two, the authors found. “That means every 16.5 years, the number of mutations you pass along will double. And in 50 years—say, at age 80 instead of 30—you’d bequeath eight times as many DNA mutations.”

So let’s compare apples to apples and women’s chromosome mutations: advancedfertility.com/patient-education/causes-of-infertility/female-age-eggs/17% of the eggs studied from women 20-25 years old were found to have an abnormal spindle appearance and at least one chromosome displaced from proper alignment. 79% of the eggs studied from women 40-45 years old were found to have an abnormal spindle appearance and at least one chromosome displaced from proper alignment. 79%/17%=4.6X

So going from raw genetic numbers alone, that means a man’s genetic drift is no more than 1/2 as much as a woman’s and also not exponential.

Going on genetic drift alone, an 80 year old man is about as risky as a 42 year old woman.

Finally, the bad news for the aging career women is that even if they were correct, and men had as bad a biological clock as women, this would undermine their own chances in the dating market since the men they desire, the top 5 percenters, would have even more of an incentive to seek out younger, less “successful”, women in order to maximize his already dwindling chances of siring a healthy child. Why compound a risk by doubling it with a similar aged spouse ESPECIALLY if you have choices?

Granted, these women do have a way out such as marrying a broke but healthy 20 year old man with fresh sperm and paying his bills OR buying sperm and accepting 100% financial responsibility for the children.

All this said, I have a dear friend whose first child had autism while the 2nd turned out normal (with the caveat that the 2nd child became a crazed blue haired feminist, but that was due to a nasty divorce and the mother getting even with him via parent alienation).

I wonder if that scenario occurred because he knocked up a young barfly who smoked and drank regularly before conception, although she knocked it off after she got pregnant.

@Typo-MAGAshiv I was just thinking about this scenario recently in regards to the Strong and Independent heightest who was griping that out of the 1% of men available that she's interested and a fraction of that which will talk to her, she insists they pay for meal dates with her.

it's an interesting analogy because women REALLY are into restaurants for that 1st date experience. Some corporate nuns I knew in the 90's would go celibate and refuse to screw chad without that sit-down meal.

Now consider: They like to say they're "old fashioned" but isn't "old fashioned" about, er, a woman cooking for THE MAN?

If they REALLY want old fashioned, shouldn't they be Martha Stewart types hand baking pies, cakes, and other goodies for hours a day when they get home from their slave-wage job?

I blame "gentlemen prefer blondes" which normalized and even glamorized entitlement gold diggers.

youtu.be/viUT9Alc1yo?t=23

She's so cute and funny!

So now these women are addicted to that feeling of importance. To be a Queen with people serving them. The serf peasant who brings her food on a nice plate.

Chop chop!

And the sex slave who pays for things because she has a magic V.

I have a meal whore post coming up for weekend content.

My post on reddit for "Also unlucky in love and life." has resulted in a permanent ban of polishknightusa on reddit including removing the post. The reason was: "After reviewing, we found that you broke Rule 3 because you shared intimate media of someone without their consent. Sharing, threatening to share, or soliciting intimate or sexually-explicit content of someone without their consent is not allowed. This includes fake or “lookalike” depictions, as well as images or videos of intimate parts of a person’s body, even if the person is clothed or in public, if contextualized in a salacious manner (such as “creepshots'' or “upskirt” imagery). This also applies to leaked, stolen, or privately-shared content of someone who does not consent to sharing it on Reddit."

I have appealed the decision (I had 250 characters to do so) by stating that the image in question is of a woman in a sweater with no quote "intimate" details visible even implicitly and the image had been shared by the woman herself, publicly, elsewhere on reddit.

@Typo-MAGAshiv It says at the bottom of the notice that this wasn't an automated decision.

Upon further review, it appears that someone commented on the post who, himself, was banned soon afterwards for a SINGLE post of a girl wearing a bikini and him complimenting her phyisque in a "you go girl" fashion! His post and remark doesn't appear to be "intimate" or explicit but I think perhaps I was found guilty by association somehow.

I did some reading that others have been permabanned (such as yourself) but used the appeals process repeatedly for up to 6 months to eventually get them overturned, but no more than one additional appeal every 24 hours. I read it takes up to 2 weeks for an appeal to be reviewed.

I have part 2 ready for this post and can post here and then someone can kindly post to reddit if possible or I'll do so myself hopefully when, or if, the ban is overturned. It shouldn't cause an issue at least in this sense since no photos or "intimate" material is involved.

@Impressive-Cricket-8 @moorekom I'm writing up a kind followup appeal (in case my first appeal isn't addressed in a timely manner) so please don't assume anything about the moderators or alienate them here in case one of them reads this. I hope that there was a moderator who perhaps misinterpreted the Rule 3 policy which applies to sexual harassment, which is clearly what I was NOT doing, and another moderator will kindly see that this was not the case and quietly overturn it but if it gets heated, then they may circle the wagons.

This is, I hope, an opportunity to defend "fair use" and cooperation between reddit and this channel. Whenever moderators here have criticized my posts, I took their criticism with kindness and respected their responsibilities. I am sharing that same sentiment with Reddit.

I have friends from all sides of the political spectrum including gays (that I strangely get along with quite well) and leftist academics and find common ground with them. I remind them that my great-grandfather union organizer would probably punch them out as corporate sellouts. My father drank beer with members of The Panzer Afrika Corp when he was stationed at the 126th artillery in Munich in 1958. I believe that if I respect and listen to someone while holding my ground, I can often come to common grounds with them. Not always, but sometimes.

I am welcoming this interaction with the Reddit moderators as a personal growth opportunity.

@Typo-MAGAshiv @lurkerhasarisen I'd like to share a fun story that happened about 2 years ago for context.

2 years ago I went to a different dentist than our usual one to get a lower price on Invisalign for my wife. The guy seemed ok and reasonable and we got a quote for an 18 month treatment plan at $1300 (our cost, and the insurance covered $1300) and started. That dentist left the practice and my wife was assigned a new, but sleazy guy but we continued because we had a treatment plan in place.

About 5 months into treatment, the orthodontist said my wife was done. My wife was confused. Both our family dentist and the other dentist said this was an 18 month plan. He said it's done and we should still pay the full price. I was livid and said over the phone to his office that he should reconsider.

So I researched and went to Blue Cross's website and did a data dump. Blue Cross records showed that the treatment plan was billed badly and for only about $400, repeat, $400 of TOTAL treatment, our share being $200.00.

I smelled a crooked orthodontist.

I went to the original orthodontist who had since moved and he confirmed the treatment wasn't complete. The original dentist charged us a $300 consultation fee to draft up a statement that it wasn't done.

I looked up the dentist's personal and business address and filed in small claims court and got it served to him by the sheriff.

So my wife and I took the day off to go to court and it was like TV. We waited our turn and the judge advised anyone who wanted arbitration to take that offer. In addition, because I had made an (innocent) mistake and hadn't filed the correct form to serve the defendant, the judge was going to extend the trial date for the future and told me the form I'd need to file to continue. So the dentist not only had to take THIS day off, but another one as well. He agreed to arbitration.

I was amused that the dentist acted towards us and the arbiters as if we were in the wrong and delusional, that he had offered to finish my wife's treatment (he hadn't, he just said pay in full) and so on. He even tried to compliment my wife and said he'd give her a "prettier" smile. He told the arbiters that he'd offer us up to $400 in compensation although we had paid $1300 up front for the full plan.

I was surprised that the arbitrator who said he worked at Blue Cross previously didn't understand my legal point that a managed care insurance policy set the rates for what a provider can charge and what a recipient pays (which is the point of such a policy). I hoped the judge would at least understand that if BC/BS says only $200 billable services to us was performed, why should we be on the hook for more than that?

I told the arbitrator that no deal and I, ok, (we), wanted $1300 back, all of it, or else see 'em in court (again) and maybe (again) (who knows, I don't mind taking the day off. I wonder how many patients he didn't get to see that day).

Defense agreed and said they'd send me a check within 30 days. It was written up as a court order.

4 days later I got a check in the mail, with DOUBLE postage (RESPECT!). I was going to frame it so I deposited it electronically.

It bounced.

My wife called him and he said there was a "technical" issue at the bank. At this point, I didn't say it, I had him under a state felony statute of writing a bad check if he didn't honor it but fine, I agreed to redeposit it in a week and it cleared but, sadly, I had to give it to the bank personally. I am framing the envelope though and a printed copy of the check as a trophy for my office.

I am still considering reporting him to the state board because I suspect his business incompetency and dishonesty is hurting other people. I was going to present some of my findings to the court as evidence of his unprofessionalism.

Anyways, I don't mind going through the appeal process at all. It's more fun than going on a dinner date.

I do IT security compliance audits for a living. I fill out forms all day long while working with nice people.

Don't threaten me with a good time.