Supposedly there exists a such thing as feminist mathematical epistemology. Did we need any more proof that women can't understand math? http://www.jstor.org/stable/3482752?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

@OmniSovereign If you're good at CSS, you've come to the right guy. Jump on the Dev IRC channel https://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=RPDev

@Reddest-Pill you can PM me here: https://www.trp.red/pm.php?userid=RedPillSchool

or join the DEV Chat: https://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=RPDev

Donate 2 revive knowmore.org w/ this fundraiser. Site has list of over 600 big corporations & ALL their political affiliations, scandals, & investments. They plan 2 develop an app where u scan a barcode & c which company ur endorsing.

-

I just gave $20.

@redpillschool Did you know that Dalrock has been excluded from the Wayback Machine[archive.org]? I wonder why...

@Rian_stone Our advertised policy for all speakers for over 3 years, on all events pages has been, "*All speakers subject to change at the discretion of 21 Studios or the speaker. "

This safeguards both you the speaker - Rian - as well as 21 Studios as an org. It has been clearly displayed on all relevant speaker sections the entire time.

What Rian is engaging in is tortious interference.

Humans evolved visual pathways that distinguish individuals by facial features, while chimpanzees distinguish by ass features. Changing appearance of anogenital area while fertile believed to have lost advantage once humans started walking upright. This may have led to the development of prominent breasts in human females.

journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0165357

In lay terms, we started out in the jungle as ass men, then were supposed to have evolved to face men, but our eyes keep dropping to those breasts.

Getting to the Bottom of Face Processing. Species-Specific Inversion Effects for Faces and Behinds in Humans and Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes)

For social species such as primates, the recognition of conspecifics is crucial for their survival. As demonstrated by the ‘face inversion effect’, humans are experts in recognizing faces and unlike objects, recognize their identity by processing it configurally. The human face, with its distinct features such as eye-whites, eyebrows, red lips and cheeks signals emotions, intentions, health and sexual attraction and, as we will show here, shares important features with the primate behind. Chimpanzee females show a swelling and reddening of the anogenital region around the time of ovulation. This provides an important socio-sexual signal for group members, who can identify individuals by their behinds. We hypothesized that chimpanzees process behinds configurally in a way humans process faces. In four different delayed matching-to-sample tasks with upright and inverted body parts, we show that humans demonstrate a face, but not a behind inversion effect and that chimpanzees show a behind, but no clear face inversion effect. The findings suggest an evolutionary shift in socio-sexual signalling function from behinds to faces, two hairless, symmetrical and attractive body parts, which might have attuned the human brain to process faces, and the human face to become more behind-like. |