RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
For most of the time I've been alive (which is admittedly limited) - sex = gender. The two terms were interchangeable.
Lurker addressed that in one of the linked threads:
One of the perversions of language that I've been objecting to for decades is equating "sex" with "gender."
That shit started when I was a kid, and I remember a few adults speaking against it for the same reasons Lurker did.
But most adults just went with it, and here we are: the younger generations think "they've always been the same thing".
who controls language, controls [something...]
- George Orwell
@adam-l @adam-l Women love the fruits of civilisation -security and technology but they do not want to pay the dues -that is their husband's/ fathers's/ brother's job.
One of the greatest and most patriotic women of modern times said “There is no such thing as a society – there are individual men and women and there are families.”
Now she was probably saying it in reaction to the bloated left wing state she dismantled and re-built but I don't think a man could have said such a thing. It sounds like anarchy. It is short sighted. The whole anglosphere is a society and we really need to build it up as its our biggest protection in the face of a world that grows in power and wishes us little good.
Its worth looking at the root of society, its not the same as the root of state. societas is an alliance, association, union of people who are not related by kin for a common purpose. You can't escape your family or usually your state. You get to choose your allies. Women don't understand the ally relationship. The hive is not the same as an alliance. The hive pretends common interest while actually being full of self interest. An alliance is entered into with self interest and maintained by common interest.
Read More@Bozza government is essentially a monopoly on the legal use of force/violence
@Bozza the term "incel" was coined like in 1999 or 2000, and shot up in usage (especially as a slur/pejorative) in the 2010s thanks to that Elliott Rodgers piece of shit.
The term "inspin" is relatively new, coined by @lurkerhasarisen only 6 years ago. Here's the comment thread where he first mentioned it, as far as I know (sadly, he deleted that comment before The Red Archive could archive it), and here is his WATGMA post proposing it to the community at large.
It caught on at WAATGM and WATGMA, and I saw its use a bit /r/MGTOW and /r/MGTOW2, but I haven't seen it catch on much elsewhere.
Maybe in another 5-10 years, it'll be just as common.
@Stigma oh, just go illegally on a boat
They might give you free housing and other benefits
This article, together with Camille Paglia's manifesto (first chapter of her Sexual Personae book) contributed to one of my key realizations: women are alien to civilization in general. Not to this or the other, the good or the bad kind. To the notion of civilization itself.
It's been found and described before, of course, and if you have the notion you can identify it throughout history. For example, that's what Freud meant when he described "women's Superego" as weaker than men's.
It's a humanity-wide "let's you and him fight" for the damsel.
@First-light I see it as an extension of Karl Popper's Paradox of Tolerance or "weak men create tough times".
Ironically the left love to trot out Karl Popper as a reason for why their brand of politics is better than everyone else’s.
But the point is that Feminism and the rise of these ideologies can only exist because of the foundations that were already in place. None of this came about from building anything.
You take away the structures of Western civilisation and these movements cannot sustain themselves. They are paper castles.
It's a humanity-wide "let's you and him fight" for the damsel.
Which is hilarious, because throughout my entire childhood and early adulthood, one of the stupid things feminists consistently preached was "if women were in charge, there'd be no more war!"
@Typo-MAGAshiv I'm a bit confused.
Obviously as far as I'm concerned the two are interchangeable. You had gendered toilets (male/female), or you fill in a form and it would ask your sex/gender and they were essentially the same thing (male/female).
I get (somewhat) where lurker is coming from that gender is linguistic - languages have gendered terms. But that seems to me more of a pedantic/academic argument.
But maybe I'm missing the bigger picture here?
