Went on a date last weekend. She seems cool and we hit it off. I did some digging, she’s been in three LTRs. After LTR #2, she went back to the guy in LTR #1. After LTR #3, she went back to the guy from LTR #2. She has a pattern of going back to her exes. I’m reading the sidebar but I’m struggling to figure out whether this is a red flag or if this is a case of AWALT.
There are 4 types of women
Those who like you she'll fuck for free. Unless you look like DeCaprio or Brad Pitt, this is unicorn. I would say it doesn't exist or rare. Besides, even Brad Pitt will have to shell lots of money if he knocks up someone. So sex and knocking women up will never be free. Many movie stars are often caught hiring prostitute. They can get someone pretty for free obviously. But if the cost of getting a "free" woman is higher or the quality is lower, then shelling some dough may be preferred.
Those you can pay to fuck. These are plenty. Of course, you will need at most 1-10. Depending on how rich you are. What's difficult is filtering them out. There are pretty women that would literally fuck anyone that pay. So there are just too many in this category.
Those you can't get even if you pay but want to scam you.
I guess I am being comprehensive.
Now I need to device a dating strategy that's dominate normal strategy in all 4 cases
First notice that the 1st one is rare. You don't want to aim for someone rare. Why? Because what you get depends on supply and demand. Price favors the rare. You get more cost effective result if you aim for something common.
For example, say you insist that you only want to fuck woman that wants to fuck you without you paying them. Say there are like 5 of them in this world. You got to choose the prettiest among 5 women.
If all 5 are ugly, for example, what next?
That sucks. Many become incels/mtgow, single because of this.
In general, in picking filters, you don't want filters that's too tight. You want to filter women that those most useful for you can pass through and not wasting time and money on those who don't.
Now #2 is fine. Through out history sex is always transactional. Read the bible. Ancient marriage is buying a wife with a cow or something. It's called bride price. You can no longer buy a wife. She can change her mind and leave. It's called humans' right. But you can hire sugar baby.
You can't have literal sex slave (figurative ones can still work) but you can get sex employee.
Employees work better than slaves anyway. That's why Romans use free citizens as ship rowers.
Certain jobs need a little motivation and positive incentives go a long way.
Now women that pass your filter is no longer 5. More like 500, 5 millions. You just need to make sure you don't waste time and money with anyone not close to the best you can get cost effectively.
500 is a lot of number. You can filter for those who you really want. I usually filter based on age, IQ, beauty, and thin body and of course cost effectiveness. Women willing to do fair mutually beneficial transaction is the right personality.
Those who think being paid for sex is some form of patriarchy oppresion that must be illegal and bla bla can fuck some libtard somewhere else.
Then there are women that you can't get even if you pay. Some of those women would still want to scam you. Many will go to dinner to get free dinner. If a sugar baby doesn't want to do video chat, she's most likely ugly or fat.
If sex is not transactional, you can end up spending a lot of money on trying to make her like you and get nothing. You attract scammers.
Many men spend lots of money on women that fuck someone else. I know. I did 6 years ago. That's the time I joined firehouse. I spent money on her and she fuck some white guys for free. My other sugar baby help her scam me out of jealousy. Women are often scammers for many reasons.
Fuck. I don't even understand why people say pimps, johns, and stuffs are coercive or deceptive.
Men are not the one wearing beauty filters and make up and stuffs. Men don't commit maternity fraud you know. Somehow societies love to blame men. Yea. Men are competitive and love any excuse to exterminate each other. Life I guess.
Hell even women that consider your genes may try to scam you as part of shit tests. They won't to know if you're a simp or not.
I think the Jews have a phrase for such shitty situation that hurts their gene pool survival. NEVER AGAIN.
Since then I swear that all sex must be transactional to keep scammy women away and to reward smart pretty women that choose me.
My strategy outperform normal dating strategies in all 4 cases.
Read More@Problematic_Browser #2 big time. Most modern TV shows and movies are, sadly, made for people with the attention span of the dog from UP in a park full of squirrels. Worse, they actually encourage that in people. I have a very good friend who binges shows all the time and complains that fiction books are boring, plays are boring ect...not enough explosions in them I guess.
I got back into reading more about 2 years ago and I love it. Took some getting used to again, but stories are much so more rewarding when they have a slow burn...it's about the journey, not the destination. I can spend weeks reading a book and feel satisfied the whole time instead of 50 minutes an episode and feeling empty until I watch the next one.
I'd be interested on your thoughts on Situation #2
Whether I should hit her up with a strict hook up frame, or whether to hard next for disrespect.
@throwaway0387387 oh man oh man.
Mistake #1: catching feels in general.
Mistake #2: oneitis over a chick you never even smashed.
Mistake #3: being shy… and taking a whole month to grow a pair of balls. A month is like a year in hot chick time.
Mistake #4: you could tell by her demeanor that maybe she is not into you… yet you kept chasing and kept feeding her attention. Simp behavior; cut that shit out immediately or this will be a repeated cycle.
Mistake #5: telling her that you’re “falling for her” when you never even piped. She’s 1000% been getting her back blown out by chad this entire time.
Mistake #6: continuing to helping her w school after she rejected you. Simp behavior.
Mistake #7: replying to her first snap.
the only thing you did right was walk with B.
Action Plan:
Okay boys, holy shit I didn't know my comment about beta was going to get so much traction
So my date was fine. She had to get up at 5:00am, I 100% know I could have pulled her tonight if not for that
I kissed her hard at the end of the date like a G and she was definitely into it. Flirted with me all night. She was trying to get kissed all night long
She's coming straight over for date #2
Just gonna set up logistics tomorrow or whatever, we have several plans set to go at my place, she basically invited herself
How do you separate off doing things that hurt you in the long run for gratification from a symbol that represents that and why would you want to?
Classic motte and bailey argument.
You assert satan as a literal entity to make fantastically stupid arguments about how I "worship" something I don't even believe exists.
Then, when I dismiss without evidence what you have asserted without evidence, then suddenly he's just a symbol of self-destructive hedonism.
Spell out what you mean once and for all.
Do you:
Choose one and only one.
If your answer is #1, miss me with your fairy tales until you have some proof.
If your answer is #2, I am under no obligation to use other people's metaphors, whether they be "satan" or "the patriarchy" or any other compound proposition I don't agree with.
Read MoreThing is good men don’t become kings, greedy men do.
I was going to slightly agree and say that this is only true for most and there are a few exceptions, but I'm going to be humble and say I don't actually know at all. What people say about kings and the stereotypes of them are usually just propaganda from republics and revolutionaries.
But if I become wealthy in any way and I think there’s a chance I’m doing #2
You'd have to have way more wealth than you think is realistic. Like fate is shining upon you levels of unrealistic.
I've been told by chads that I'll never make progress in the gym because of my weak genetics.
I don't think such a conversation ever took place.
1) gym culture is one of encouragement.
2) everyone can make progress, especially when realistic about their goals.
To expand on #2:
Yes, your genetics limit what you might be able to achieve. For example, someone who is a straight-up ectomorph won't be able to get as large and strong as me, a meso-endomorph. However, he'll be able to get shredded and have a visible 6-pack much easier.
Figure out your body type, embrace it, and train accordingly. I embrace looking like a cross between Shrek in human form and Wreck-It Ralph, and it has served me well.
What Manosphere figures just get under your skin?
I'll go first.
Some content creators seem like they have a hidden agenda. You ever get that feeling that something is not quite right?
Here are a few:
#1 - These guys are like the Beastie Boys. They seem selected by the industry to capitalize on this new "rap thing" get TONS of industry support, rip off the mannerisms and culture of others, have world class song writers, producers, and sound engineers to make the product, and get beaucoup money and rewards. But they do not live in the hood and never really have.
#2 - Back when r/atheism was a default sub, I used to enjoy the banter there. But out of nowhere this dude named Sam Harris shows up on Youtube. IMMEDIATELY my radar went off. He studied the arguments, said the acceptable words, and went after the popular targets. And people ate it up! Then little by little, he started targeting Islam specifically. BOOM! There it is! Not one fucker would acknowledge this obvious fraud. So I stopped commenting. Then he is on Bill Maher - how the hell did some loser like that get THAT much exposure and access? Hmm. Curious. Fast forward to today, and everyone knows he is a POS. But the signs were there from the beginning. He was ALWAYS a POS. My gut was right on this one.
#3 - The manosphere is being subverted from within. These men listed above have a STRONG Beastie vibe to me. Let's call them "Beastie Men". I could be wrong, but I think they are all imposters.
Read More