I've been working on it for a few years, so here's the big announcement:
I'm a psychologist
I got my degree and I'll be giving consultations.
I'll offer a few sessions in exchange for donations to TRP.RED. A chance for members here to sort out some things, while supporting the platform.
PM me for details.
2Search feature?
Yeah, up top. Thing kicks ass once you know how to use it.
For example, if you want to search me, enter "+magashiv" (minus the quotation marks) and whatever other terms you want. If you try to search my full username, the hyphen is a minus sign, and so your results will include every post in which someone says "typo" but no instances of "magashiv".
I learned that after months of thinking the search sucked lol.
But anyway, underscores tend to fuck it up.
You have to type it out manually (and hope you got it right)
What?
@Stigma that's fine!
Just show up and say stuff like:
this place is too brown/yellow! You need some diversity! Now subsidize my existence!
There is almost no gender in modern English -she, he and it are very rare examples of gender still surviving in pronouns. So gender was an easy word for anglophone liberals to abuse. To them it just meant a pronoun and they have come to love their pronouns. Had English been a truly gendered language, I do not think this notion of changing your gender could have got started.
That's kind of why the "Latinx' bullshit didn't take off among Hispanics; to them, they're either "Latina" or "Latino".
@SeasonedRP As an old pedant, I would like to add that the gender of agenda is neuter (plural, 2nd declension).
agenda is a Latin gerundive, a verbal noun. Since it is a noun, in Latin it needs gender. The gerundive bit gives it a "should be/ ought to be" meaning. The verb is ago, agere, egi, actum -the verb to drive. So agenda being neuter plural literally means "things that should be driven" or "got done"
If sheep were to be driven it would be oves agendae, bulls would be tauri agendi because here the sex of the animals must be reflected in the gender of the verbal noun.
You can't entirely separate sex and gender but gender is a linguistic reflection of sex. It also applies to things that do not have sex at all but it often feels like it makes sense in these things hope, victory and mercy are all feminine in Latin -things men wish and hope for. Love on the other hand is masculine -because well men do love better.
The left just take words that we accept and bend and re-purpose them like rape, trauma, abuse and so on. There is almost no gender in modern English -she, he and it are very rare examples of gender still surviving in pronouns. So gender was an easy word for anglophone liberals to abuse. To them it just meant a pronoun and they have come to love their pronouns. Had English been a truly gendered language, I do not think this notion of changing your gender could have got started.
Read More@Typo-MAGAshiv It started when I was young. Even then, you could tell there was an agenda behind it because it was just leftists saying "gender" instead of the proper term "sex." But it just became more and more common and now people don't know the difference.
