I left her home after she didn't want to finish me off

We woke up, had morning sex, I couldn't cum and I told her I want to finish me off by giving me head. She sucked it for a bit then said she is tired and can't do it anymore.

I would understand if she did it for like an hour but she sucked me for like 2 3 minutes.

She said she can't anymore but I almost came, I was close and she just stopped. I told her I need a bit more time and she rejected me.

I got up and told her I have something to do for 2 3 hours, smoked a cigarette and left.

She is one of the 3 girls I'm fucking right now. But I like her the most.

Her hamster seems to be going crazy right now cuz she asked me many times and is now messaging me what was the problem. She asked me if it was because she didn't make me cum, I told her that there is no problem I just have some things to do.

Thoughts?

@sdfgjghk It's already happening: marriage rates are cratering, and I've seen several articles bemoaning the fact the it's turned into the equivalent of a luxury good for the upper economic classes.

It's very clear that when it comes to everything from longevity to physical health to mental health to creating an optimal environment for raising children to accumulating inter-enerational wealth, stable marriage is the gold standard, and good stable marriage is the platinum standard. A poor kid with two parents who are devoted to each other is better off than the child of a baby-mamma with a winning lottery ticket.

But gynocentrism and hedonism define us now, so marriage is no longer stable (and even less often good and stable). So while guys like the PragerU people talk about the benefits of marriage they have to ignore the even greater damage caused by divorce. (Link below... not one word about the likelihood or cost of divorce.) Let's say a single man can create a 7 or 8 lifestyle (1-10 scale). If he has a good, stable marriage he can make that a 9 or even a 10. On the other hand if his marriage isn't good he's going to maybe have a 4 life, and if it's not stable, either (Princess leaves because she's not happy), he may end up much worse off, especially if she cries in front of the cops or the judge. If it really goes south he may literally end up a dead (that's a hard 0 on the 1-10 scale). When you consider that odds or those various outcomes, a sure-fire 7/8 seems like a pretty shrewd play. And I say this as a guy who's happily-married since the 1980s with what I consider a 9 life.

The factors that increase the odds of having good, stable marriages are well-known, and they require both self-discipline and long planning horizons. The same willingness to practice self discipline and maintain long planning horizons that create wealth also tends to create good, stable marriages. It's no wonder that wealthy people have better marriages: not only is money less of an issue, but they are the very same people who possess the traits that bolster marital stability. Worse still is that the law treats marriage as a temporary arrangement. It's easier for a woman to break her marriage contract than it is for her to break a 12-month lease on her apartment, because when she leaves her marriage her ex-husband has to keep supporting her... she gets paid to break her vows and he goes to jail if he doesn't pay her.

If the law treated marriage like any other contract, it would be a lot harder for women to bail out and cash out. Not only would there have to be actual fault, but she would have to prove it rather than just allege it. Of course a woman would be free to leave any time she wants to, but abandonment would be grounds for him to divorce her... she leaves with whatever she can carry and leaves everything else behind (including the kids). Nobody gets "stuck" if they want to leave, but no longer would women be able to demand husband-level support from a man for whom they are not performing wife-level duties.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=etvfhnzmcoy