RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
@Vermillion-Rx The fact that this guy needs to trumpet this thing (which he claims makes no difference) suggests to me that it is in fact a big issue on his mind and the only way he can cope is to wear the cape and be the great captain save a hoe.
If a couple can't even kiss before marriage, something is not right. There is a failure of nature desire there. He got played.
look over some other stuff
Too tired. Fuck it.
@Vermillion-Rx I'm about to go to sleep, so I'll try to keep this short so I can look over some other stuff
He's partly right, concerning forgiveness.
Here's where he's wrong:
1) if someone hasn't wronged you, there's nothing for you to forgive. A known thief who has stolen from multiple people but not from you isn't really eligible for your forgiveness.
2) you can choose to overlook someone's promiscuous past, but it certainly isn't a moral obligation to do so. In fact, it's quite foolish to do so. It would be like trusting that thief from my example in #1 with a hefty sum of your money.
I predict he's going to learn the hard way in a few years, if this isn't just rage bait, engagement bait, whatever.
Tag @lurkerhasarisen @houseoftolstoy this thread gives me deja-vu; didn't I engage one or both of you in something similar a few years ago at the WAATGM subreddit?
Read More@deeplydisturbed I gotta disagree
Not that I think he's 100% right 100% of the time or anything, because he's not. No one is (not even me!).
But I don't get what you could think is "off" about him. His "Sidebar Series" playlist is the best Red Pill content on YouTube, and much of his other content is good too. I've listened to the first four of his "Praxeology" books on Audible (twice each for the first two), and they're excellent.
What exactly do you find "off" about him?
I made it, lads!
Already found myself in a brothel, from an eager tuktuk driver looking to make some commission. No coupons for him today, though.
@Typo-MAGAshiv Waller, that was it. Yeah he came across much better than the others. He was defensive about letting Theroux closer into his personal life, and once he did everyone I watched the documentary with (not red pilled) agreed him and his wife were both quite happy with their lives.
I don’t know much about Waller at all, really, but I picked up on his insecurity being the bravado that he sells to young me is undermined by the genuine love he has for his family (it isn’t, but he seemed to think so initially).
But this is why I’m separating the red pill from the “manosphere” - the names you mention that Theroux failed to interview aren’t the snake oil sellers, and so not the subject being investigated. I mean I can see I’m splitting hairs in a manner, but I went into the documentary prepared to go on the defensive against Theroux, assuming he was going to lump in the respectable names by way of taking on the easy targets. To my mind, he didn’t do so.
Read More

1