RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
I can't help but wonder: What are the goals of these women? Why do they want a relationship in the first place?
At 39, you are unlikely to have biological children, so building a family seems an unlikely goal. I guess she can adopt, though?
She already earns a comfortable amount of money. It sounds like she can follow the male script, invest wisely and have enough money for retirement when she is too old to work herself.
There seems to be no illusions about magical fairytale love. There are no mentions of personality related attributes. All that matters is height, wealth, and location.
So she doesn't really need a man, yet she is desperate enough to hire help to find one. The implication I am left with is money and status is the goal. She wants someone to fund her early retirement by becoming a stay-at-home wife, while gaining the social status of being married.
But that just seems so unbelievably shallow, and honestly somewhat exploitative. And bad for her. She can live a perfectly good life on her own and can likely support her parents by herself. Yet she instead chooses to invest her time and effort into this most likely fruitless endeavor.
But she doesn't need to be unhappy. She won the game she set out to play! Enjoy what you have, woman, instead of yearning for the impossible, and your life would probably be much better for it.
Read MoreFrom Brave's AI:
No, you cannot send direct messages to someone on Venmo without initiating a transaction.
According to user discussions on Reddit, Venmo does not have a standalone messaging feature for non-transactional communication. To contact someone, you must use one of the following methods:
Send a small payment with a note: You can transfer a minimal amount (e.g., $0.01) and include your message in the transaction note.
Send a payment request: You can send a request for money (even if intended to be ignored or declined) and attach a message, which the recipient can see.
Comment on a past transaction: If you have an existing transaction history with the person, you can comment on that specific completed transaction.
Venmo’s design is strictly financial; any communication is embedded within the context of a payment, request, or transaction comment.
Send a payment request: You can send a request for money (even if intended to be ignored or declined) and attach a message, which the recipient can see.
I'm going to send these dumb twats payment requests, saying something like "you should pay me for inflicting that stupid birthday request upon my eyeballs. That'll be $20".
Read More@First-light in case it wasn't clear, my reply was to him in particular. He's still a free man.
But yeah, this sucks big time for men like you. It's fucked up.
I mean, I knew there were risks when I got married. I didn't realize just what a bad deal for men it really is, but I still freely chose this. You made choices to avoid this, and your government is fixing to assrape you as if you had gotten married all along.
As if your government hasn't assraped the native Brits enough already.
Most women do not understand that the grass is green where they water it
The grass is greenest above the septic tank.
One day, she'll have a necklace made of her old engagement rings.
Are you mad? What are people going to think about me?
Well gee lady, they're going to think you are going to remain single so long as you fail to grasp that your marriage value is rock-bottom and your demands sky-high.
@Typo-MAGAshiv Yeah but when you want kids its an invidious choice. The law should allow men to be the best father they can without facing terrible consequences. We need to fight this not just say "too bad losers"
I cohabit for the daughter I share with my lady. I did this thinking I would be safe I case of a break up and I chose to allow my daughter's mother to freeload off me for my daughter's sake. This position is already a net loss to me. Sex, housework and cooking (some grudging) do not equate in value to a free home and bills and food.
This is not a nice thing to have to write but I will review my position if this is passed as law. Sorry but that is how it is.
The big socialist state will eat us all if we let it.
