@SwarmShawarma the important thing to note is just how quickly they dropped any pretense at all about being concerned about islamic radicalistaion - almost immediately, they dropped the act.

What they are really about is preventing right wing ideas. The have publicly stated that the greatest terrorist threat to the UK is the rise of what they call the 'far right'.

And their markers for far right ideology?

• national pride
• immigration sceptisism
• any internet history showing research into immigration numbers
• support for brexit, or antithapy towards the EU
• critical views of the state
• concern about stabbings
• concern about grooming gangs

Litearlly about 85% of the UK population is far right. We are basically the same as east germany, where a small elite have classifed the majority as extremist.

@First-light

Great spot First-light.

Just to be clear -that is the NZ telegraph, not the daily telegraph of the UK.

For those of you in the USA, you might not be aware of what is actually going on here in the UK. The 'pathways' computer game is a pretty big deal here, because it sort of represents an unmasking of the state and what is really going on in the UK.

For context, the PREVENT program needs explaining. It's a sort of multi agency funded initiative that has the stated intention of 'stopping terrorism before it starts'.... In their own words, what they do is watch for extremist views and content and then use law enforcement to prevent people from becoming 'radicalised'. Because people that have been radicalised might go on to commit terrorist attacks.

So far, so orwellian. But the really unsurprising thing is what they regard as 'radical' content - basically the thing they are worried about is 'rigth wing extremism'. And by that they mean things like immigration skeptisism, mens rights advocates, anti feminism, etc etc. They see the threat to the UK as the rise of 'the right' or any kind of 'nationalism' or 'national populism'.

They don't seem to think that jihad is an issue - they are far more concerened about things like....The Red Pill.

The reason for recent events in Minnesota is that it is the location of, by far, the largest financial fraud in the history of America. Everyone is in on it. The governor, state officials, mayors, local officials, and judges, all the way down to municipal judges. They also have key allies in the universities and the professions. The Biden administration was also in on it. Don't believe me? Try going through an airport with $1 million in cash and properly declare it with the feds, like the Somali couriers did. Better yet, organize some friends to participate and have your group take $1 million in cash through an airport every single day for two straight years, again all properly declared. Try it. Let's just say that you won't have the same outcome that the Somali couriers had.

The people organizing the assaults on ICE have ties to those corrupt government officials and to allies in key institutions. Lots of money is at stake. The people funding the attacks on ICE are the usual billionaires and foundations whose dual goals are the destruction of Western civilization and making America a majority non-white country. They'll fund anything that furthers those goals, especially violence. And unfortunately, the government is also funding these outrageous actions through NGOs and likely providing operational support, though not as openly as under Biden and Trump I. The important takeaway is that none of this is organic. Everyone on the ground participating has been recruited to do so and provided both instructions on what to do and supplies. And there is big money behind it.

Bessent is following the money, and it doesn't look like this will end well for those officials in Minnesota. And we'll see how well protected those billionaires and foundations are, though I'm not optimistic. So far, no one's laid a glove on them.

@MentORPHEUS Honestly, it’s becoming hard to decipher where it was I put my line in the sand in regards to what level of power or authority I permit the state to have over me. That’s the game though, right? A million different formulas concocted in smokey rooms by unknowable men in suits all perfectly executed on in the right order so as to discombobulate the world views of the weary masses.

An influx of immigrants here, a progressive agenda undermining the purpose of unions there and hey presto, your white working class union man is now firmly right leaning.

A bit of gender studies here, a bit of identity politics there and hey presto your educational institutions are completely compromised and pumping out ideologically brain dead peons.

None of it makes any sense, and the positions will change again before we’re done.

What we won’t do, however, is make sense of it in the chaotic minutiae of senseless deaths contrived by all of this nonsense in the first place.

These events are only serving to entrench everyone in their fox holes, and the truth is out there in no man’s land.

@MentORPHEUS Yeah, he was resisting, period. But in the end, that won't really matter. If you watched it frame by frame, you would know he had something in his right hand as he was rearing up from the ground. Gun? Who knows (probably not, but it doesn't actually have to be a gun to matter). All of the cops where clearly spooked by something because they fell back, letting him rise. Empty holster--something in his hand--getting up without being restrained--and a gunshot rings out. Those that shot after the first shot no doubt thought there was a real threat to them. Now what matters, and unfortunately we don't get an answer to this in any video, is where did that first shot come from? Did the one officer just pop one off for giggles? If he did, then he is in trouble. Did the P320 spontaneously discharge, as they are known to do? Well, then that is a completely different story. So who knows so far.

@Stigma One problem of today's news coverage (both by official media and non mainstream sources) is that we get individual incidents made into very big things. This is essentially a war on a very large corrupt group. It a big battle fought all over the state. No battle plan ever goes off quite as planned. It is very rare that a battle is won without some casualties that may not have been necessary.

People on both sides argue themselves silly over small moments that were judgement calls.

Wise law abiding citizens stay away from officers of the state doing stressful jobs and making fast decisions on limited data. Officers of the state try to avoid harming those who are not the direct targets of action. But in the end life is not perfect. I don't see many people saying this. Its either "this saintly man was jilled unfairly" or "this bad man was fairly shot". Not "This guy got into a tense law enforcement situation and it really backfired on him. No one wanted this but this is what can happen in these situations. Let this be a lesson to those who get involved in others' battles. It may become your battle without you realising it". You might also add "Do you really want to be a martyr for a group who are ripping your country off?"

We do need to grow up and see reality. Casualties are inevitable in battles.