RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
@adam-l I don't like these bows and arrows, they kill at long distances and they have taken war to a new level beyond what we could ever have conceived of. I don't like these copper daggers, they are much better for war than stone knives as they do not crack under pressure, war is now more dangerous. I don't like these mounted warriors, its a whole shift in war, so much speed and power is beyond what we could have ever imagined. I don't like these cannons, no one is safe even in a castle I don't like these muskets. Any peasant can be trained to kill at a distance in short order. Have you seen what those bullets do to a man? These repeating rifles have taken killing to an unpredicented level. These tanks... These air ships... These planes... These bombs... These missiles....
From circa 60,000 BC till circa AD 1968. "Sheesh you are right love, lethal things, me and the boys better get some or we are toast"
1968 to present day "The whole world will be destroyed by war. Just stop fighting. If the answer is war then it was a very silly question. Smash the patriarchy and we will all live in peace and women will get railed by only top guys."
"Guess you are right love, lets spend the national budget on single mothers. Good job you had such a good idea or we might all be dead. Thank goodness women are in charge now"
"But Dad what happens if one group of men don't play ball with Plan Cuck? What if they keep all the bangy stuff and use it to take our land and our hottest women while turning us into a slave race?"
"Don't be silly son. This is not the dark ages or some incel fantasy novel. We have civilised everyone on earth now and we have the UN to tell naughty people off. Look its just told Starmer to give away the Chagos Islands because our ancestors were naughty and collected us strategic sites."
"I am so glad we have Plan Cuck dad. But I am still worried. I heard there might be some bad men out there who would ban bum sex and cross dressing and make mummy stop being rude to men and sis from getting her tits out when she is pissed. I heard we let a lot of them in the country"
"Gosh yes, telling mum and your sister to stop being rude would be much more serious than being invaded by people with bombs. Its worse than you think son, its not the peaceful folk who come here to enrich us, its small minded incel losers who think there could be wars coming and think we might need national pride and a strong army that are the real threat. These men are called facists son. They don't even believe in Plan Cuck. These idiots want to re-arm!"
Read MoreOne of the liberals greatest wins was to make everyone terrified of a war with bombs
Bombs kill. And they are technological inventions that transcend a simple perceptual grasping. It's natural for humans to fear them. Unnatural is not to fear them.
The white male genes are going to diminish
Robert Trivers, the legendary evolutionary biologist (RIP 2026!), sums up any reasoning based on propagating your genes this: (paraphrasing) My genes could not care less about me, and I feel the same way toward them.
Those said, it's true that the psychopathic elite, probably seeing how effective the US has been in integrating second and even first generation immigrants, is going all-in in a greedy strategy of not giving a shit about their citizens, counting on replacing them when they crash out, rather than providing them with a good living standard. I'm afraid ther war is in line with that strategy, not in opposition.
Read More
@adam-l I totally agree about it not being black and white. It is also very much in our interests to not be fighting wars now when we are so weak overspent and so spineless.
I am not pro war. I am pro nationalism, pro pride in our history and pro preparing for war.
If you have no meaningful preparations for war, then you are on Plan Cuck and we can only blag Plan Cuck for a few more years before someone calls us out. Then what? run like women to someone who may be strong enough to give us shelter from our enemies?
@First-light lol!
I get what you're talking about.
It's not black and white (war or peace), though. There are eras of more war, and eras of more peace. And there have always been people that side with peace.
There have always been people siding with war, too. Look at the US. What good did it do them? Large swaths of the population below the poverty line, and almost none their women suitable for being a mother. Liberals have probably been even more pro-war that conservatives.
Nah, the pro-war bet isn't worth it. Yes, it's probably the likeliest outcome, but there's no profit there for most men.
I'd rather support the peaceful way, however small its chances for coming through. Big risk-big reward.
As a sidenote... You know who were the first to setup a welfare system for married women? (For simply engaged, also). Not the Left. It was the Nazis. (Mentioned in Martin van Creveld's The Privileged Sex). Every political party is pro-female.
Read More@MentORPHEUS I haven't even been posting here at the dot reds all that much lately
I know you're right about this, but I need to free up some time (or take better advantage of opportunities like what today is looking like) to do this
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
Bro, you're asking a highly subjective question so I'll try to give an answer here. Some boundaries are hard lines in the sand.
Like I don't tolerate public or private disrespect. And a woman hitting me is an immediate next. Some of these I assume they won't cross so I don't state them. In the case of disrespect, I state the boundary after she has violated it and that's the warning shot. That's the "I'm only going to state this once" boundary.
Now, boundaries without consequences are simply preferences. So the question is not what is your boundary, but what are the consequences of crossing it?
Now this also works in reverse: If I state this boundary what are the consequences of stating it with her?
For example: a few guys have the boundary of "my girl doesn't have a girl's night out ever" If that's the hill you want to die on, so be it. That boundary isn't about her actions it's about your insecurities. The subtext is that you're worried about infidelity or just simply lack confidence in your ability to keep her around. So the consequence of you stating this "boundary" is that you look rigid, insecure and controlling. These are not attractive traits and she will most likely either find someone else or sneak around to have her friendships. This boundary isn't about girl's night it's a boundary about her not communicating what she wants and most guys not wanting her to cheat. "Don't cheat on me" doesn't need to be an overt boundary.
My big suggestion is to simply write down how you would like to be treated by a woman at a bare minimum this is you foundation of boundaries and will give you a place to go. Then decide if they need to be overt or covert. There's no right answer as to when or how you can state them. Don't mistake your own insecurities as boundaries. Boundaries are about her concrete actions, not your insecurities. The last thing to remember is the more you date the more your boundary list will change.
You've got this brother! I hope this helps guide you a bit.
Read More