There was a man in jail in Kentucky on video feed when I first sat down, and there was the judge, a victim advocate representing the ex-wifes interest, and the county prosecutor. The conversation seemed to be aimed at bail. The judge asked how much his back pay was and they said $98,000. I thought "Wow, what a deadbeat. How could you get that far behind!?" A little foreshadowing, I later felt ashamed I jumped to this conclusion.

The conversation can be summarized: The man was a truck driver, and leased his own truck. Somehow his support had been set to $20,000 a month, nobody blinked an eye at this or said "What!? That's ridiculous!". That means it only take about 4.5 months to get that far behind, but he was probably slowly going up over years of barely making it.

He said he worked so much to pay it that he didn't have time to go to court to fix it. As taking that time would set him back on support tens of thousands of dollars, and each modification attempt took multiple court dates months separated from each other. He said when he showed up to the first court date, his ex filed for an extension and the date was moved, this set him back, the second court date they wanted to perform proper discovery and subpoena all his financials so they rescheduled for months later and this set him back. He said that he couldn't get it fixed without it getting behind and that would make the judge not look kindly upon him in the hearing.

He asked the judge if they could release him with a GPS ankle strap so he could keep working in the interim. The judge said no, and that an ankle tracker in Kentucky wouldn't work for them in another state. So no bail, and the judge said he has to wait in jail for the court date in 30 days. The guy looked genuinely suicidal at this point. He said his support was set years ago, and at the time he had 3 trucks and they had added the value of the leased trucks into his income, making him look like he earned about $1 million a year when he only earned about $22k before taxes, and that his taxes were going unpaid too.

Nobody in that room gave him an ounce of respect or understanding. He was told to file for a court appointed attorney, and we'll talk next month.

Also, there is a lot of deep negativity here that is misplaced.

Specifically:

4- They are naturally adapted to waiting.

This is not true, women have the patience of a toddler.

9. They assert themselves through the male suffering that arises from desire or love

Most women do not "assert themselves through the male suffering". There is no benefit to women of male suffering, quite the opposite. They directly cause a vast amount of male suffering, but this is not the intention or the benefit.

11. They like to confuse us with mental tortures

This is mostly not true, and is mostly exaggeration

16. They try to induce us to chase after them so they can have the pleasure of rejecting us / The feel attractive when they manage to reject a man

This is just not true - the truth is that women don't want to have to reject men because this is conflict and ends the chase. They want the chasing, but they don't want to do any rejecting. Believing that rejection is the desired goal for women is counter productive to men, and it's not true in most cases.

19. They need to feel that they are deceiving or manipulating

Actually women do their best to persuade themselves of the opposite.

24. They are patient

Err... no, they are not.

30.  They prefer those who approach them pretending not to be interested

This is weird... I mean, I see what he's getting at, but this is not the right way to say it.

32.  They feign indifference to suggest they are interested in someone else

No - they feign indifference to get an increase in the male bid.

41.  They frustrate us by raising and then dashing hopes of sex

It's more useful to see this as an auction. The aim of raising sex as a possibility is to invite bids. The pretence that sex is imminent is a way to get more and higher bids. The sexual behaviour has selfish motives, not evil motives.

Anyway. This guy is convinced that women are evil and do bad things to men because they enjoy doing bad things to men and causing male suffering.

This is absolutely not the case and is even useful to believe.

The reality of women is that they are completely and utterly selfish but not evil. Almost all female motivations are selfish: they are trying to get something for themselves rather than cause harm or hurt to men.

All these writings are so pervasively filled with "women are evil" that we shouldn't be encouraging this stuff.

Let's focus more on "women are selfish and self centred and do not care about you" rather than "women are evil and trying to harm you".