Thoughts on this comment by @Overkill_Engine: www.forums.red/p/whereareallthegoodmen/325835/but_life_didn_t_work_out_that_way/7877072

Women shouldn't have been taking the historical ~80% chance to pass on their genetics just for being born with a working womb for granted.

When female supremacists and chivalrists talk about this, I chuckle because they don't consider the darwinistic consequences. Much like with AI, as humans become dependent upon a technology they wind up submitting to it. Men evolved separately to become smarter and stronger than women. In the animal kingdom, where women are often single mothers like cats, they retain their ability to hunt and, more importantly, bear offspring for their entire lives! Yes, a 16 year old housecat can still have litters of kittens.

Indeed, the "working womb for granted" is only for an effective 20 year window in that an eligible man is not going to prefer a 40 year old woman. It's like paying full market price for milk that expires tomorrow. That analogy hits them hard because they 'get it'. My wife will spend a full 5 minutes checking every bottle of milk for the freshest marked one. I'm not handsome but I had a child because I sired my daughter at age 50. So it's not all bad news for men.

Note that the majority of these women throughout history until recently didn't get to choose their mate. The dominant males chose mates or the woman's mate was chosen by a Patriarchal elder. Feminists rail on and on about rape. Wait, RAPE!!! They scream about it. Yet, that was the foundation of their pretty privilege of being protected and looked after. The vast majority of men had to "settle". In other words, men had their mate choice foisted upon us by circumstance. 80% of us do not get the pretty movie star and we learn to live with it. 80% of women "choose" the movie star, don't get him, so they're "raped"!

Imagine that existence. Imagine being in a continual state of misery because you're not a movie star or married to one because that's the life you "chose" but it was denied to you.

Keep in mind that eventually, many women didn't have children such as spinsters. Their parents weren't going to fund a bastard child and these women were unable to find providers. Many of them were ugly or genetically deformed and no man would provide for them. The welfare state, sadly, funds these women's lifestyles and we live with the consequences. Combined with a state that no longer executes criminals but holds them and even permits them "conjugal visits" produces future psychopaths.