but that's assuming the data is credible
By that argument alone you can dismiss everything, including gravity b/c there's always a possibility the data is wrong.
But it's not good data
Post the data you think is good. Not an opinion or a blogpost, the data.
treated like a lab rat if I want to buy groceries or leave my house
"Hurr durr I can only go out to do essential stuff for 2 months and can't hanlde that."
Say you have corona, what good did your amendmets do for you to protect your heath and your life? Say you didn't know and you infected others. Was your freedom to go out to the proverbial beach worth it? Was going to the proverbial beach a priority over the risk of your and other people's health and lives?
People getting sick and dieing is nothing new. It's part of life.
Sure, so how about you go to a nearest hospital who has corona patients and tell the doctors to just relax, b/c the data can always be wrong and people always die, see what they have to say about that. All while taking no precautions b/c "people die all the time".
does "shutdown" have different meanings depending on the $size$ of your company
"Corporations are bad b/c they are big and don't die as fast as small businesses and that's somehow unfair to small business and somwhow makes the big corporations bad."
An argument along the lines of "the gas tank in smaller cars runs out of gas faster than in big cars".
What I'm getting at is the words sound great but dont equate to playing out as defined.
Why does Poland have 100 times less cases and deaths than USA under same quarantine rules?
How did 1,5 million pople got infected? Is it the globohomo's fault or did the pople got infected by being in contact with eachother?
Say you find a random gun on a random street. You have 2nd amendment why do you also have gun handling rules? I mean, people die all the time and the data about gun deaths is manipulated by MSM so why not just pull the trigger b/c you have the right to do so.
Read More@JamesSkepp if we go by the info you provided than sure I'll agree but that's assuming the data is credible. But it's not good data so we cant make accurate assumptions that warrant being treated like a lab rat if I want to buy groceries or leave my house. Do you have data to support justifying tyranny ? Nope.
People getting sick and dieing is nothing new. It's part of life. So how is that a grounded argument for shutdowns or stay at home orders? Does the shutdown really slow contagion or does "shutdown" have different meanings depending on the $size$ of your company ? What I'm getting at is the words sound great but dont equate to playing out as defined.
doesnt mean I lose my freedoms
Of course it does. If you are infected and you don't know, you're personally responsible for every person you infect. If you're not infected, you might get in contact with someone that is and transmit it further even without getting infeted yourself. That also makes you personally responsible for every person you infect.
You choose principles and risk, I choose priorities. Perhaps if you did the same you wouldn't have 1,5 million infected and as big as economy slowdown as you have. Less cases faster recovery.
shelter in place of healthy people in theory sounds great but in reality does nothing
If nobody's in contact with other people, nobody's transmitting. As simple as that. You don't need deep virology understanding to figure that one out.
no data to support there being any long term effects either.
ourworldindata.org/covid-cases?country=pol+usa
How to you explain the disparity between both of Poland and US numbers (13%, 10% from comment above)?
Even if you multiply the fake Chinese numbers 10 times, you still end up with half of what US has in country 5 times larger.
'Murica YEAH! cough cough cough
Go suntan your asshole while reciting amendments.
Read More@JamesSkepp your fear of dieing doesnt mean I lose my freedoms. If your scared stay home and hide.... like you could do before. Stay home til no one gets sick again.
None of your claims can be supported by any credibility. Death rates arent accurate, shelter in place of healthy people in theory sounds great but in reality does nothing, no data to support there being any long term effects either.
You are just spewing up MSM talking points and nothing else.
@TitusTorquatus day game is the most fun. "I like your shoes" has been my favorite of the year.
There is always a tidal wave of horny aggression on all sides during "transitional states" as GLO described it.
Will be totally open season if you have even half decent day game.
@assassin it's been the opposite for me. Tough to close on a cold approach when everyone has to wear masks. Not to mention every girl seems to be terrified to leave their house and if they do they rush around stores like crazy people. Pre covid connections are just as horny as usual, so that's un changed.
I do agree with Glo and Uncle Vaz though that after the restrictions ease up there will be a frenzy of ass to be had. Since among other things I have never seen so many girls out getting groceries, hiking, fishing etc.
@redpillschool MSM has never been concerned with truth, just getting views for $. How/why anyone consumes that content and think its truth I'll never understand. It's just "entertainment".
I've visited local hospitals and know numerous people in the healthcare field that support that it's all non sense. Bad data and fear spread faster than anything else.
It's easier to fool someone then to convince them they have been fooled...
@tw0fou4six8 at least you admitted ya cant read difficult books.
