It is nice to get acultured and tease at the same time 'Women are really aware of it?'

My FB told me this Greek saying that has few variations.

Το μουνί σέρνει καράβια. /// Το νινί σέρνει καράβι.

το μουνί σέρνει καράβι • (to mouní sérnei karávi) (literally: a cunt pulls a boat)

(colloquial, vulgar) one hair of a woman can draw more than a hundred pair of oxen (women have great influence on their male partners/husbands and can have anything done for them)

Although foundations for claims are shaky in a way this is merely a saying it ties to what I have stated some days before. Men will not pull women back because the women will always pull more with the same pubes than a man can.

The roots of the expression go back to ancient Greece, when sailors dragged ships overland to the Isthmus of Corinth.

In order to avoid making the round of the Peloponnesus, as the canal had not then been opened, they proceeded to tow the ships from the narrow passage which divided the sea. They placed tree trunks and dragged the ships over.

Towing took some time, however it was preferable for sailors to sail around the Peloponnese. Besides, they had the opportunity to visit the famous fornications of the time, the “sanctuaries of Aphrodite”.

Thousands of prostitutes lived in Corinth at that time, as in Acrocorinth there was a sanctuary in honor of the Goddess Of Love, which Medea had built. The sailors who made a stop in Corinth did not fail to visit the brothels of the area. For this reason, there was a rumor that those who chose to drag the boats ashore actually wished to visit the brothels.

And a cheesy song here:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2EC96IG0Bc&list=RDB2EC96IG0Bc&start_radio=1

Women as literal godesses.

We've been saying that Blue Pillers pedestalise women. I don't think that the notion has sunk deep enough - and that has certainly been the case for me, in the past.

Religion is a symbolic expression of the internalized image of a parent. We think of God as "our father", and, as far as internal representations are concerned, that's not even metaphorical. He loves, is always present, guides, forgives, or is even fearsome. Just like dad.

Now, the point I want to make is that a Blue Piller might be a convinced atheist, and even an accomplished world-renowned positivist scientist. However, when the notion of woman (i.e. the internal representation of his mother) enters the discussion, his rationality is cancelled and all his higher cognitive functions are subdued, to be taken over by his sense of utter dread, his infantile fear of annihilation due to his mother being unchecked by his father, and ready to consume him, her child.

I believe the source of this dread is extremely ancient, animalistic, from the age that female animals literally ate their runts.

The illustrating case, in my mind, is a scientist I greatly admire and respect, Robert Sapolsky. He's kind of the embodiment of an open-minded and dedicated scientist, complete with social consciousness. It all goes out the window when woman enters the picture.

I believe the above is the way to solve the nagging puzzle we may have when confronted with some modern, or even older, scientists. "He's so fucking brilliant, how can he not see women for what they are?" It's that his brilliance is suspended, and he's running on religious mode.