Welcome to The Hub. This is our welcoming tribe dedicated to introducing yourself, meeting new people, and learning about new tribes.
@MentORPHEUS I love it when advertisers show people you know don't need their product, like when ads for boner pills feature two older, yet very attractive and in-shape people. If they're both in that kind of shape, they're more than likely still fucking under their own power.
WAATGM is not a sole purpose of the website but rather as a commentary.
We are hosting WAATGM on our platform, and therefore it's our problem to deal with any complaints of the content we are hosting unless we follow legal requirements related to taking them down
No way around it. Must be a public figure. Or some other site must be hosting it.
Is hearing loss genetically linked to blonde hair? Reason I ask is, for years, every time the internet serves me a hearing aid ad, the model is a <25yo blond chick.
1
1
A) less hassle to just obscure the entire face
B) I agree that we're losing something here, as a woman's looks are an important part of the equation
I'm not it
I'm not SAYING it is wrong to obscure the faces, as WAATGM tribe is not a sole purpose of the website, but rather as a my commentary and I think face is kind a important to comments, even if not full. If you can't get the reverse image search from everything except the face then you can't get it using i.e. half a picture or emoji on tits, or as someone proposed placing a ballsack hanging off a chin.
A) I don't get what you're trying to say in your lower part of your reply
B) I didn't watch this particular set of videos, but yeah, commentary videos get around copyright claims thanks to Fair Use.
C) as far as obscuring faces at WAATGM, that's more about doxing concerns as I said near the bottom of my OP here:
As for the faces in photos being censored, this is due to doxing concerns
Yes, the complainant who spurred these changes was concerned that someone might reverse-image search her face through Google. Yes, after she posted it to a public subreddit herself, and a subreddit with far more subscribers than ours and a much higher likelihood of having stalker-types who would do such a thing.
In other words, she's fucking retarded but it's better to assuage these concerns for the good of the forum.
Read More
1
2
@Typo-MAGAshiv her behaviour is being bashed by the next streamer (although in a delcate way, she didnt agreed to it) and this kind of the talking head s bashing is common.
I'm not it is wrong to obscure the faces as WAATGM is not a sole purpose of the website but rather as a commentary.
@First-light I think a lot of people (rightfully) fear the precedent that can be set by removing kids from parents.
First it's for being exposed to feces for too long, but then it's for teaching kids "dangerous ideas" such as free thought or not trusting the government or that men and women are different.
