The post is gone. What was the content?
@Bozza I had forgotten about this one
Fucking tragic
When the women were allowed into the workshop, members decided to keep a quiet room with a model railway display in it, just for men.
"We [the men] escape now and again [to the quiet room] and have a chat and weigh things up."
@Typo-MAGAshiv As someone who was quite involved with Scouts UK. I found it particularly insulting that Boy Scouts had to be opened to women, but Girl Guides didn't have to be.
So you basically say NO.
Therefore you are blue pill.
But I believe you can be a red pill alpha if you start with sidebar and a few fcks from my stash.
I didnt suggest anything, you respond to your own thoughts,
I asked if you speak English.
You posted Morpheus holding a red pill labeled "yes" and a blue pill labeled "no".
Red Pill = reality, truth, etc no matter how brutal.
Blue pill = comfortable lies.
You were therefore saying that yes, you speak English.
I responded that I don't believe you, and that was because your English is frequently so terrible.
It's a lot less funny now that I had to explain it.
Have some vcards.
My fwb has seen this as she suspect something...
So I asked her what are her takeways.
The main question was how does it benefit boys, over being influenced by media the other way (no jargon but that supposed to mean blue pill). I told her basically anything is better, even these obscure characters, as once boys will get out of anger state, they will do better than before, and since these boys are listening to them then, financially speaking, there is a market for that.
That was spruced up with allegories that she can refer to - herself, to increase takeaway from me.
There was few other things, but only one I genuinely could agree with and is quality observation.
When Walller's girl was showing around a gym, she has shown one mannerism that I have seen.
Talking about her daughter "she's got a Lambo" talking about toy car. One thing from 2 weeks, factual but probably unimportant in greater scheme of things.
I agree on:
that it contributes to that gain, providing "maximum exposure to individuals who consider any kind of attention a win. It leaves a bitter, nasty taste in the mouth".[11]
He criticises that nothing came out of it, that would kill the "manosphere", despite big name behind it.
without providing appropriate pushback to their views.
Because that needs questioning things, and modern audiences and creators don't do that, that is too dangerous.
Read MoreI didnt suggest anything, you respond to your own thoughts,
0.409304