@Typo-MAGAshiv

OK here's how I see it.

There is a multi-billion dollar industry, plus the hard core of about all the countries in the world, spearheaded by the Anglo-Saxons, that has been pushing a bogus gender theory for the past half a century or more. About 100% of the huge movie industry is single-mindedly focused on pushing that narrative. They have destroyed the lives and mental health of millions of people.

And we're just a bunch of guys, basing ourselves on the research of a handful of spergy evolutionary psychologists and our own experience, that have countered that huge narrative successfully: boys growing up now have an alternative, even if they still need to be lucky to bump onto it.

What we've done is the equivalent of taking over an aircraft carrier with an AK-47.

In the face of all this, why the fuck would I draw identity from and identify with such a huge and variant group as "the whites".

Take a page out of Einstein's book: "Although I am a typical loner in daily life, my consciousness of belonging to the invisible community of those who strive for truth, beauty, and justice has preserved me from feeling isolated"

@Typo-MAGAshiv

White people have ended slavery in all countries under our control. It has been this way for well over a century.

Speaking of crocks of shit, the above represents a carefully crafted and maintained rationalization and cope. The American South had to get dragged kicking and screaming at the point of cannons to end formal slavery within the USA, and the attitude of presumptive superiority and dominion over black people still lives on today in huge numbers of the people there. I know this because they frequently blurt it out publicly from their own mouths.

America didn't END slavery, it only put superficial layers of disconnect and plausible deniability over it by subcontracting it to other nations with large and powerless populations that could get exploited, and the spoils of this still funneling directly to the wallets of a very tiny percentage of Americans. The practice lives on strongly today, take Iran as a current example. Look at how we uncreatively had invested years grooming a member of the Pahlavi family to step in when Iran's government "fell" (note the passive voice) under military assault by the US and our dirty proxy Israel, to restore the brutal control of the Iraqi masses and go back to treating the oil under their sand as OUR property.

I find disgusting the presumption that currently and formerly enslaved people get expected to behave with servile gratitude for our direct and indirect exploitation of them. That we did them some kind of favor, that whatever crumbs remain from what we take from their lands and their labors exist only because of our exploitive presence there.

4th Generation Warfare Handbook

Written by the author of the Maneuver Warfare Handbook and an active-duty USMC officer with experience in Iraq, 4th Generation Warfare Handbook is the doctrine for a new generation of war. Over the last 40 years, the world has gradually entered into a post-Clausewitzian state where the wars are undeclared, the battlefields can be anywhere, the uniforms are optional, and the combatants as well as the targets are often "civilian". Conventional militaries have repeatedly attempted to utilize technology to meet the new challenges posed, but even the most advanced technology has provided little more than meaningless short-term victories rendered futile in months, if not weeks. This inability of Western governments and militaries to come to terms with the changing nature of modern warfare has led to failed interventions, failed occupations, and now even failed states everywhere from Eastern Europe to Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. And with the recent mass movement of peoples around the world, 4th Generation Warfare can be safely expected to appear in Western Europe and the United States before long. Drawing on their decades of experience with military history and military action, the authors have distilled 4GW theory into a short, concise, easily accessible handbook that provides the soldier, the military analyst, and the civilian observer with a guide to understanding and responding to the changing realities of this challenging new form of war.

You can also find mention of this book on Youtube, Odysee, as well as on other websites.

#2015 #1stEdition #4thGenerationWarfareHandbook #4GW #WilliamSLind #Writer #Marines #Veteran #Officer #Books #eBooks #World #History #Military #Strategy #Reference #PsychologicalWarfare #SpiritualWarfare #BiologicalWarfare #CultureWar #EconomicWar #BureaucraticWarfare #KineticWarfare #UnrestrictedWarfare

@sirGreen

Question about Kino escalation in bars

Hey, newbie here. I recently went on a date in a bar with a girl I met recently. Anything went pretty well for the first part.

When I started with kino, I started slowly; some taps on her shoulder to make a point, holding her hand over her phone when she was showing me some photos in her gallery, other taps on her thigh, our legs were touching all the time, etc.

To all of them, she responded neutrally, no particular reaction, just letting me do that. In my mind, when dealing with women, any obvious stop or hold back is a green light, so I escalated. I touched her thigh with my hand and rubbed my thumb on it a little. (I think doing this is pretty normal sexual escalation imo) She said "don't do that" and she instantly took my hand away from her.

This was pretty surprising to me because our legs were still touching. So I thought that this particular gesture was the problem. I didn't know how to interpret this 'rejection'. I have 2 explanations in mind:

1. She was either not DTF or looking for a boyfriend type and wanted to take things more slowly. Or she meant "not now" and wanted to spend more time with her before that. I know that in those types of situations, the strategy is to try it again later. In this case, this type of escalation could be considered basic screening and is still ok.
2. Her ASD got activated because we were in a bar (not that touch-friendly like a club), and anyone who was looking at us could have seen that my hand was resting on her thigh. In this case, then this type of escalation is just not appropriate for bars and should only be done in more private places like a car, home, etc.

Maybe some girls are ok with being touched on the thigh in public, but I would still take case two if those girls are not the norm, or even DTF girls get ASD as this happens. I would think that the problem is case two, and this type of escalation is just not appropriate for public places.

What do you guys think?

I think you should consider investing into a reliable ready reference you can pick up and study to better prepare yourself for engaging the opposite sex. I'd suggest that you get yourself a copy of Doc Love's "The System: The Dating Dictionary". Doc Love, who until his passing was also known as Tom Hodges, wrote a weekly advice column that's archive is mirrored on several mens focused sites and a podcast. His media is a bit pricey, but it's a solid foundation a guy can branch out from in RP aware circles. I'd suggest you review his advice column to decide if his view on dating and relationships is aligned with what you aspire for yourself. To save yourself a search, give this scribed link a gander to find out if his book is something you'd like to add to your library. It should also be available on libgen.

@SSBPikkon

Went to meet up with her, she seems dry over the text now

I met this girl through socials - I know it isn't preferable, but it works on younger girls.

I met up with 1 of her friends couple of months ago and she almost turned it into a friendzone, basically she wasn't interested in me. I stopped talking to her and time went on.

This girl I'm writing this post for - I added her through socials and her friend (which friendzoned me) basically showed my picture and all that.

That girl first said we can only be friends and this convo with me is your "sidequest", also she said her bf is super jealous - I took that like I'll fuck the shit out of her and she'll go back to her bf.

At first she didn't want to add me back, so I forgot about her and went back to my life. She again found me through her friend and added me - this is basically cheating tbh.

We talked and she invited me to come to a bar where she works and I agreed.

I also knew her from a party we went to, but she was very drunk and was with my acquaintance at the time.

Mind you - I did go out with her other friend a long time ago, I also wrote a post about her. I asked what her friend thought about all that - since she blocked me right after our date and she said she was bored, and I knew that, I was bored also with her and I had more anxiety and wasn't as comfortable as I am now.

But that didn't stop her from meeting me today, she can even ask some of her friends about me which have different opinions about me - I know less about her than she knows about me.

As soon as I came to a bar, she went all friendly-mode and started talking about her bf for a little bit.

I tried to maneuver convo into my favor, and we kinda did light flirting. She did kiss my acquaintance at the party where I was and ofc he's a womanizer and she hates all men apart from her boyfriend - you didn't hear this anywhere am I right lol.

The funny thing is I'm a "womanizer" just like that guy she was with and she put me in the same category as him basically - which is a good thing for me in this situation.

As time went on on our "date" she needed to get back to work and she didn't even come to my table - her stepfather came and her colleague she works with and they all sat and talked.

As she didn't come again to me I left, we said bye to each other and now she's dry over text.

I have more options now, but I still can't get past the 1st date - even if they're single or if they're "cheating".

I think girls like me because of my looks and that attracts them since they be looking at me at the clubs and my male friends said I'm the best looking one, but they don't get hooked right after - but that's just my opinion.

It's crazy that I went on the first date with 2 of her friends - 1 blocked me, 1 just left me on socials and now her it seems.

Where did I fumble?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpNNPW8Orag

It didn't read like you were expecting anything to accomplish anything, so I don't understand the concern about fumbling. If anything, it read like you were more interested with finding out if they were sincerely disinterested in you, despite your looks.

You got solid confirmation that good looking as you maybe, you're of little interest to that group. Now, you can study the book, continue to work on your face-to-face in-person social skills, and move on to other females.