RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
@Stigma Rothschild group was subject to a tax investigation in 2015. Epstein had very high up government connections. Someone like him is useful when facing tax issues. Not sure what you think this document represents. It's like hiring Eric Holder for a legal matter when having someone on the legal team with certain political connections would be useful.
@Stigma He was already rich in 2015. It appears he was some kind of spy or arms dealer. Otherwise, Robert Mueller wouldn't have been involved when Epstein first got in trouble with the authorities in FL. But in any event, info like that won't be in the files of some schlub at the FBI, or any files for that matter.
Rothschild should consider hiring attorneys that don't misspell its name in contracts (fourth line). That aside, ostensibly this agreement is for consulting services in connection with a tax investigation the group was facing at the time. Hardly some smoking gun, as Epstein was putatively some kind of financial advisor.
He was already rich in 2015
Right? You think you get a contract with the Rothschilds in 2015 for $25m as your first ever go at it? Why do I need to point out the inference that this is their middle history? Where Epstein comes from and his motivations are also published.
The other, to my mind, clear inference is who the money is circulating around - I can't sit here and spoon feed every single implication, at some point you're going to have to find the narrative thread yourself.
They didn't use the Epstein files against him, because there's nothing to it at far as he's concerned, and their own guys come out looking far worse.
- Mutually assured destruction
We've been over that before, they've kicked this football between themselves for a decade or so.
-
Why flip flop on the files then?
-
Why not release all of them?
- Why delete files mentioning Trump?
No really, he and (by proxy) his supporters need to pick a lane. There's still 3 million documents not released, claiming he is exonerated (parroting his words) is laughable.
Wallet link is back. Also the cross-site login is fixed. Logging into one should log you into forums and trp at the same time. The info link at the top brings you sidebar, and should show on mobile.
Put in any search term you're curious about.
