Welcome to the next evolution of Where Are All The Good Men.

This tribe and the WAATGM forum are moderated for decorum and the rules that are listed in the side bar. Please be sure to read them.

A couple of information items before you begin or continue your journey down the WAATGM rabbit hole:

--This is the TRP.red tribe for WAATGM. It functions similar to that social media platform with the bird icon on it just without the character limitations. This is where you can drop a simple thought, concept, or question on the community for discussion.

--If you arrived here from the Socialist matrix of fascist censorship known as Reddit, then this site will look a little different, because it is. The WhereAreAllTheGoodMen forum is the site that works similar to the original sub in Reddit. There you may post women's dating profiles and comment on them, just like in the original sub-reddit.

--For those that are new to WAATGM or those that would like to refresh their memories of a particular post, many of the original reddit posts have been archived for safekeeping and may be found here. You may also find the archive link at the bottom of the side bar (on the right ----------->).

--Be sure to check out our baby forum WhereAllTheGoodMenAre. Just like the original, this is where you can submit and comment on essays which addresses the "Where are all the good men?" phenomenon. Personal stories, theories, venting, and even how awesome life is as a MGTOW are all welcomed, but ultimately it is a place to share your male perspective as to why women can't find a "good man", or why good men are avoiding commitment.

@Vermillion-Rx @moorekom @polishknight, @Typo-MAGAshiv

One would think so, but that assumes that the admins are operating in good faith. I don’t think they are, because the post in question is both well within the sort of content that makes up the vast majority of stuff that’s all over the site, but it’s not even close to being a Rule 3 violation.

A woman voluntarily posted a series of utterly non-sexual pictures of herself in conjunction with some verbiage about the kind of man she wants to date, and when a mod took a screenshot and criticized her approach it was removed for violating the rule against nonconsensual sexualization(?).

It was neither nonconsensual nor sexual.

To me, the most telling thing is the fact that the decision was made by a person rather than an algorithm. Somebody examined the post and decided to enforce the harshest possible punishment despite the fact that there was obviously no infraction.

This was personal.