A young Native American boy is out fishing with his father. He turns to his father and asks, "Father, how is it that we in the tribe are named?"
The father replies, "Son, we name our children after what we see when they are born. Your sister Flowing River is so named because your mother gave birth to her by the riverside, and your brother Screaming Hawk is so named because the bird's piercing screech could be heard upon his first cry. Why do you ask, Two Dogs Fucking?"
You know the difference between a boner and a bonus? Your wife will always blow your bonus.
A little girl was sitting on santa's lap and says I want a barbie and Gi Joe. Santa says no no sweety Barbie comes with Ken. Little girl says, no she fakes it with Ken, she comes with Gi Joe
Difference between and lesbian and a Ritz?
One's a snack cracker.
What's the difference between a girls track team and a band of pygmies?
A band of pygmies is a bunch of cunning runts.
What's the difference between a hooker taking a bath and a nun?
The nun has hope in her soul.
RIP Granddad, who loved Spoonerisms.
You unfunny fucks should add a joke once in a while, instead of just crapping up the tribe with back and forth nitpicking of a not-even-a-joke copypasta.
Whats the difference between an epileptic oyster schucker and a hooker with diarrhea?
One shucks between fits.
@Typo-MAGAshiv Given that mating is zero sum, women have a dual strategy of: First, minimizing male strategy via social manipulation and control, and secondly, by hurting other women via social manipulation and control.
They all subscribe to the hivemind because it lessens men's chances. They all attack each other because nobody hates women more than other women.
@Typo-MAGAshiv Age gap rules are dictated and enforced by women because -surprise- it's a male advantage to be older and more settled. Team women also hates that younger women clean up so they try to outlaw that.
This is how you end up with adult women seeking permission from fem-centric culture to reward a man for his market advantages, because she’s unsure if she’s even allowed to break rank. She’s a strong, independent woman who claims equality, yet still fears being “taken advantage of” by someone she sees as having power in the market.
These aren’t the words of someone with a strong constitution; they’re the words of a group that prizes social cohesion, hierarchy, and rule-following over personal agency.
Deep down, she knows his advantages are genuinely attractive to her, but instinctively tries to undermine or downplay them, lest she provoke the wrath of the fempire.
They can never quite explain it, but “team women” always seems to argue against their own autonomy whenever men have a market advantage, like with age. Mind you the younger woman is an adult.
He's not playing by the fem-centric rules, she needs to shut it down quickly. This has nothing to do with the pics.
Difficulty in distinguishing between a shit test and a genuine complaint.
I once shared a community service experience where there was a girl who acted however she liked (https://trp.red/t/1dzp). Is it true that when a girl makes a big deal out of small things, almost as if big things are a problem, it's a form of a shit test? Sometimes, in certain moments, like when I was asked by another friend if I could play guitar, and I said no, the girl who acted however she liked said, 'Then learn it.' in a demeaning way. I mean, not everything can be done by us, but during the activities, she would often tease me with trivial issues that she made a problem, and I would just ignore it and act indifferent. Then, after some time, she would talk to me again as if nothing had happened.
For instance, I asked if she had prepared the attendance list for a presentation during the community service event, and she responded, 'You were called by the man (from the village in the event), but you didn’t listen?' (Even though the man was just asking casually, and my friend answered him—no big deal). She said it in an angry tone, and I was a bit confused. I replied, 'Why are you always angry?' She responded in a feminine tone, saying, 'I’m not angry.'
Besides that, she often tried to provoke my emotions with passive-aggressive behavior, but I would usually ignore her because I knew that if I reacted, she would turn the tables and act like the victim, even though she was the one who provoked me first with passive-aggressive behavior. I often ignored her, even though at first, I thought she was bringing up urgent issues. But when I didn’t pay attention to her, after throwing a tantrum, she would talk to me again in a normal tone as if nothing happened.
Is everything I’ve described a form of a shit test? Because the context is semi-formal (community service), where the team needs to succeed in the program, and as the leader, I sometimes find it difficult to separate whether her complaints are truly urgent or not. But over time, I’ve come to assume that she is more playing games with me. Compared to the other members of my team, they are more formal and present complaints in a more formal manner, unlike this girl. In fact, another female member of the team thought I was somewhat close to her and that something romantic might happen, even though I never thought about it in that way, as I was focused on the bigger objectives of the group.
Then, at the end of the event, she told me that I was too stubborn and unwilling to compromise. But if I reflect on all the tantrums and complaints she gave, they were generally informal and confusing, and again, I ignored her. But afterward, when the event was over and we had a team dinner, she said that our team was better than the others because the other team had more shortcomings. (This was somewhat contradictory to what she had said to me earlier.)
I have been applying the red pill principle for a long time, but before this community service event, I always separated my professional environment from the environment where I could act freely with women outside of the professional setting. What I found a bit challenging in this experience was context switching between being professional or playful. I don’t want to take risks if something goes wrong because I am the leader of this team.
Edit: My current answer is by maintaining frame, I always shut down her complaints by ignoring her, staying friendly and formal as formal as I can be. Don't want to risk any bigger potential problem thrown at me.
Consider investing into a reliable ready reference you can pick up and study to better prepare yourself for engaging the opposite sex. I'd suggest that you get yourself a copy of Doc Love's "The System: The Dating Dictionary". Doc Love, who until his passing was also known as Tom Hodges, wrote a weekly advice column that's archive is mirrored on several mens focused sites and a podcast. His media is a bit pricey, but it's a solid foundation a guy can branch out from in RP aware circles. I'd suggest you review his advice column to decide if his view on dating and relationships is aligned with what you aspire for yourself. To save yourself a search, give this scribed link a gander to find out if his book is something you'd like to add to your library. It should also be available on libgen.
Read MoreThe Inversion Matrix
#2025 #InversionMatrix #WideAwake #Media #Video #TwitterX #Clown #World #US #America #SpiritualWarfare #PsychologicalWarfare #UnrestrictedWarfare #Demoralization #IdeologicalSubversion #CultureWar #EconomicWar #BiologicalWarfare #KineticWarfare #Intelligence #Information #Gathering #Espionage #Indoctrination #Coercion #Brainwashing