Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
I don't think disregarding the central theme qualifies as "tweaking the rules."
One can read all kinds of things into what she wrote with a reasonable degree of accuracy but the inescapable fact of the words on the screen is this woman simply isn't actively seeking commitment. She may need a bailout but, at least according to the information available, she's not actively pursuing one.
As such, she doesn't fit rule 5.
Without that as our guiding star we'd eventually and inevitably devolve into just another "point and laugh at the foolish women exhibiting stupid behavior" community, of which there are already dozens if not hundreds scattered across the web.
@Typo-MAGAshiv @moorekom @deeplydisturbed I respect the rules and that's why I check here if any doubts, but I thought these following statements qualified as significant indicators she was "seeking commitment". Quote: “I would not be physical for a long time” “absolutely be an issue if things got serious”
If she's NOT looking for commitment, why would she be engaging in trad-fem games of withholding sex until commitment and fretting about when things would get serious?
I thought this qualified for regular content and was wondering about the flair: she has some "strong, independent woman" going on (while unable to afford getting her car fixed) as well as "single mother tears" and "bailout" (even though she's in denial that's what she really needs).
That said, I can post for weekend content if that's ok and flair appropriately either as Shitpost Saturday or one of the above.
Read More@Typo-MAGAshiv @moorkom
I will occasionally advocate for tweaking the rules.
This woman is CLEARLY a "WAATGM" candidate. How many of our red flags does a woman (or post) need in order to qualify!?
We are needlessly shackled by our own rules.
/Rant over/
Not seeking commitment, and nothing from the second half of rule 5 either.
I could see it as "shitpost Saturday" since she is such a parade of red flags, but nothing else.
@polishknight I'll have to look it over again in the morning, but this does not really seem to fit the theme. If not for the age, kids and the blown out back, she is indistinguishable from a 25 year old poorly educated stripper. She is good for discussions here, but not in forums.
@moorekom @lurkerhasarisen @Land_of_the_losers @Impressive-Cricket-8 @deeplydisturbed @woodsmoke (don’t tell @Typo-MAGAshiv )
Need help with flair. I think "strong, independent woman" but some of her comments elsewhere suggest otherwise. preliminary title:
"I found a nice, traditional man but he's a Trump supporter. Ewww."
@moorekom happens to me a lot
@Typo-MAGAshiv I plead pre-coffee haze.