@Lionsmane8 traditionalism is still female-centereed, but I'll concede that this feminist bs has gone way over the top.
When you look into it it becomes kind of obvious.
We know that those truly believing in this nonsensical gender theory are crazy, but what kind of crazy? It's the borderline: based on primitive cognitive functioning, (e.g. statistics are ignored), a collection of processes known psychoanalytically as "the pleasure principle" (hence the focus on sexuality) as opposed to "the reality principle". Women are particularly susceptible, and it's basically brought about by poor mothering, i.e. by her mother operating unleased, independently of any male control and tempering (the "devouring mother"). Psychopaths are indeed "successful" borderlines.
There is, obviously, a link between the societal collapse and mental detoriation of the population, and especially of the elite. Psychosis proper doesn't explain it, but the Borderline, i.e. psychotic function specifically when it comes to relationships with Others, does.
So, some borderlines spend their time fucking unrestrained, some others transfer a sexual rage into their ideology, and end up in a paranoid hate of the men (father...) that are not there to satisfy them.
Status (i.e. university positions, journalism) is a substitute of a cure for them. Give them some status, and they will take care of the divide, so that you can conquer the population.
When you care about power, you do want to turn everyone into your bitch.
Read More@Lionsmane8 What are you referring to as halves? Of the first movie? Or 2 out of 4 movies were good?
I personally really enjoyed the trilogy. I don't consider #4 to be part of the series.
@Typo-MAGAshiv I'm putting some thoughts onto the page regarding dodging bullets. I think it's one of the more interesting facets of the red pill (in general) which is understanding that some arguments are fake, and that only some people are able to see through the fake argument.
So many ideas, theories and institutions in our world today exist purely on flawed logic. When you do away with the flawed logic, nothing remains. You can actually rule out entire ideologies based on internal logically inconsistencies without having the debate they want you to have.
I don't care if a boy "feels" like a girl, there's no defining these things outside of sex. They used sexual terms to define them. It's NOT a real argument. It's a fake one.
I'm reading my telegraphic posts outlining my grand theory and they sound like fucking conspiracy theory mantras.
I need to write a few well worded articles, otherwise I guess no one will be able to follow me... This summer is the time.
Matched with girl. Setup date plan and got her number within 5 texts. On text I try to schedule to meet in my city - she lives 3+ hrs away. She seems really interested and said before that she wants to go and would wanna come here even, I said "I think you should" She replies "hahaha it's just a long trip, and I'm not sure how I can get there and also get back in such a short time" which I totally think is totally valid it being 6+hrs
I'm thinking with abt just replying "That's fair" and see what happens. I thought abt offering to let her sleep at my place, as its the only solution and ideal scenario anyway. but not sure abt that in case we don't vibe on date, and if I'd do that I think wanna call her not text it?
What do u think is the best way to seal this?
Tell her "that's fair" and leave it at that. Your idea to invite her to crash at your place will let her know how interested you are and this early in the game, that tends to kill a chicks interest fast. Besides, most hookup apps I've been shown give users general locations for the other party in relation to their own. She knew it would be three hours one way to your city and still chose to waste your time thinking she was going to meet you.
Do yourself a favor and study the book I suggested to you three years ago. It'll help you to better filter out the females only out to waste a guys time. Try to mix things up with more actual face-to-face conversations with females, even if it's just the cashier at the store.
Read More
The system is using the "Borderlines" to push the gender narrative.
People around the BPD diagnosis really lack a core, so they can't safely latch onto reality. It's "white madness". They typically use either their attachment or/and opposition to power to delimit themselves, or... language constructs! to compensate for their extended blind spots regarding reality.
They are something like the "poor relatives" of the psychopaths: while the psychopath uses evil to constantly anchor themself to something, the Borderline's psychopathic mode is only intermittently activated. They are both mad, though.
Postmodernism is the philosophical expression of the borderline personality (dis)organization.
When you're ready, you won't have to dodge bullets.
The transgender debate. Pointlessly confusing it seems. Two teams: team biology, and team postmodernism.
Team biology is too busy arguing definitions with team postmodernism to realize the argument itself isn't real.
The circular logic itself is nonsensical. A woman is somebody who feels like a "woman," says nothing and everything all at once.
"You're denying that trans people exist, you bigot!"
The postmodernists expertly craft their arguments to be unfalsifiable. Clearly the people exist, it's the argument itself that does not. But they manage to frame the public debate in a way to prevent the code behind the Matrix from being on display.
You can't define modern gender theory without referencing sexual traits, words, and terms... which exposes its dependence on the very concepts it claims to transcend. It's not a real argument. None of this is real. It is incoherence embodied.
Most people won't understand this. They think that the argument is real. It's not. It's a trick of the programmers to keep you engaged in the things that don't matter so you don't notice or escape the Matrix.
Once you realize that it's not real, you can open your eyes. You no longer need to engage in the pro- or anti-trans debate because it was never real to begin with. Everybody engaging in it is too stupid to know it's not real.
But not you. Now you understand that when you're ready, you don't have to dodge bullets.
Read More