@TheCrimsonHeretic

1) the newbie enthusiasm is simultaneously amusing and irritating.

2) did you get AI to write that? It's rambly and kind of all over the place.

3) "irregardless" isn't a word. You meant "regardless".

4) for my part, I think using prostitutes to the exclusion of any other sexual involvement with women negates the most important factor: genuine desire. To paraphrase Cheap Trick: "I want her to want me". This reads as though it's written by a virgin, or at the very least a guy who's never fucked a woman who enthusiastically wanted to fuck him, and so thinks sex is all the same.

5) "alas". lol. Who the fuck actually says that unironically? Forsooth and prithee!

6) the Red Pill was never meant to be a movement. It's a praxeology.

7) for my part, I have zero interest in such get-togethers. I have a career and a wife and relatives who's safety might be compromised if the wrong people learn who I am. There are people I've known a long time on here whom I wouldn't mind meeting IRL, but there's a certain amount of trust already there that took time to build. Who the fuck are you, and why would I (or anyone else) trust you not to take photos or video of me (or others) to plaster all over SJW/feminist forums?

8) giving that screed another skim, it really does read like you're newly-unplugged, have spent too much time in black pill forums (looksmaxxing is retarded), and used AI to compose that.

Maybe learn a bit more before trying to organize or lead anything.

I’d like to open up an idea for debate that I’ve been mulling over recently. The plan is to take hypergamy’s ill-effects on men and start an organized economic countermovement against it. Let me explain: I want to apply insights like hypergamy and SMV and propose an idea to improve the real-world situation for (many) men. In a nutshell: Open chapters of an organization dedicated to offering real-world, red-pilled men’s clubs. Individual chapters can center around any activity/hobby, self-funded and run. Purposes include: Socializing, exchange of ideas and recruitment to build a political constituency for men’s interests. One primary interest I have in mind is affordable sex for men as a political goal. The point is not to complain and hope to convince blue-pilled society with logic or sympathy. It’s to promote sex with sex workers, a.k.a. prostitutes, as a prudent alternative to dating, relationships and marriage. This comes with the added benefit of being open to those men who could never participate in the regular dating market, irregardless of individual efforts on their part (looksmaxxing, PUA etc.). The point is to normalize this experience and insulate against ostracization and shame from blue-pilled society. My hunch is that the “dating crisis”, which we know to be an effect of unregulated hypergamy and sinking SMV for the average man, will only get worse as new generations of men (Gen Z, Alpha) experience an even worse lot for themselves than millennials did. My hope is that “whore-pilling” could give struggling men (young and old, currently single, bachelor, never in a relationship, virgin) a place to go that offers community and tells them they can ditch dating for good and promote moderate use of sex workers. This relieves them of the pressure to meet the requirements of runaway hypergamy for sexual urges to be met safely and predicably. If this proposal proves popular, it may draw in a critical section of the male population. The goal is to build a sponge for the bleed of male customers from the struggling (indirect-remuneration-for-sex) dating and marriage market and set up an alternative that helps them. I have little illusion that current-gen women are likely to change. But the generational turnover might see a new generation of women show up who join the ranks of a lucrative sex-for-pay market and thereby go back to offering sex at affordable rather than extortionate prices. This brings into the equation sex workers themselves. Being marginalized by the gynocracy, they might prove useful allies in making sex affordable again. This will be easier and much less risky in countries in which sex work is already legal and regulated. Sex workers, being small business owners, also suffer from income insecurity. Having scores of men’s clubs periodically patronize their establishments could improve business and income security for them. Another perk for women looking to get into sex work is the low entry requirements (no expensive schooling needed) and high remuneration for relatively low effort. Women are absolutely willing to put out if it improves their lot and a strict value-for-pay principle is instituted. However, I’m not the least bit under the illusion that all this is particularly easy or risk-free. Few men would go to the trouble of setting this thing up and running it over time. They would run considerable risk of slander, sabotage and vandalism from the feminist establishment and woke brigade foot soldiers. If one were to keep a low profile and a level of secrecy, perhaps the strategy can go unnoticed for long enough. I do however fear that paranoia might take over and twist the norms within these groups. Alas, these things, including infighting and fracturing, cannot be wholly avoided. I do however feel that the effects of the red pill on the popular male consciousness can be expanded on by strategically leaving the internet at an opportune moment to “set up shop” in the real world. Whether it be as described above or significantly different is immaterial to me. More than anything, offering real-world community and belonging is a rare proposition. Let alone one in which one’s deepest struggles and most controversial views have a place. I’d like to hear you guys’s thoughts on this topic. Is it worth leaving the internet and setting up an irl network locally?