Random Thoughts - Random Saturday Edition:

Women these days have been complaining about “men not approaching” them.

There could be many reasons for this, but let’s first clear a few things up:

1. They don’t want “men” to approach them, They want the RIGHT men to approach them
2. When they put out signals of approachability, men could read this as “she is desperate”
3. Their body language can be VERY subtle. I am an expert at this and don’t always catch it (I found this out by talking with women I dated and them saying “I was giving you all these signals and you ignored them”
4. Most men have been shot down at one point or another. I have seen absolute BEASTS among Chads get pushed away. That’s on women. They used to do this as a sport. This is the result.

Now, for the main point (observation).

I once told my daughter that some girls rely on being “bitchy” to boys. They do this because if they let one loser get away with being too flirty, it can signal to every other low level guy to give it a shot with her. She will quickly become swarmed with low quality suitors - which can make good men look at her with suspicion. Why are all those losers around this girl?

That’s what I said, and I stand by it.

So fast forward through the past 30-40 years and look at all the movies and entertainment content. The most beautiful women are almost always portrayed as untouchable, unapproachable, and perhaps a bit bitchy. Sure there are exceptions (every 80’s teen movie), but there is a pattern there.

Fast forward to 2020 or so. If you are an average girl, and you have seen this behavior your whole life, AND you are told that YOU are the prize, the high value woman, the “KWEEN”, how else would such a girl act? She wants to have the same options as those pretty girls. Who wouldn’t. And as a man I can perfectly understand this.

BUT….

The bigger issue is that the less attractive women want to appear aloof like those pretty girls, and the key element is to REPEL THE LOSERS. That’s the whole point of being bitchy. It keeps away the average guys, the introverts, the insecure or shy guys, or boys who don’t have the patience.

Guess who DOES have the patience?

Bad boys, players, and fuck bois. That shit is like a dog whistle to them. And so they push past the bitchiness and pursue. And it works! Once could argue that this dynamic is most pronounced in Black America, but I digress.

So you have tens of millions of girls who have spent their early years trying to “repel the losers” and “weed out” the weaker men, and now they are alone.

Most decent men are not going to play such games. And I am not talking about Chad and the top 10%, I am talking about the men who are in the 7-9 range. They too have learned, and one lesson above all for such men is - you will get the behavior you tolerate. So to reward bitchy, spoiled, entitled or otherwise off putting behavior is a recipe for disaster.

Add to all of this the habit of too many women (adults btw) posting men’s mistakes on social media and you have a prefect recipe for disengagement.

The bottom line:

Women:

• If you are a women who is an 8 or lower, you cannot pull of the bitchy thing. You are not self aware and men can see your stupidity. You get a pass from 16-20 years old as you try to sort things out, but after that you are an idiot and any man who gets you deserves what you do to him.

• There are other ways to welcome men into your life without being bitchy or a pick-me. In fact there are countless other options. How about start by being polite but dismissive with the men you don’t like, and being a bit more obvious with the men you do like. This is just one of many options.

Men:

• Do not approach women in public. Perhaps on a whim once in a while is ok, but don’t feed this shit. Hold the line. Women are waking up to their stupidity - do NOT reward it now. We have made such progress!

Happy New Year men. This year is going to be interesting.

It is nice to get acultured and tease at the same time 'Women are really aware of it?'

My FB told me this Greek saying that has few variations.

Το μουνί σέρνει καράβια. /// Το νινί σέρνει καράβι.

το μουνί σέρνει καράβι • (to mouní sérnei karávi) (literally: a cunt pulls a boat)

(colloquial, vulgar) one hair of a woman can draw more than a hundred pair of oxen (women have great influence on their male partners/husbands and can have anything done for them)

Although foundations for claims are shaky in a way this is merely a saying it ties to what I have stated some days before. Men will not pull women back because the women will always pull more with the same pubes than a man can.

The roots of the expression go back to ancient Greece, when sailors dragged ships overland to the Isthmus of Corinth.

In order to avoid making the round of the Peloponnesus, as the canal had not then been opened, they proceeded to tow the ships from the narrow passage which divided the sea. They placed tree trunks and dragged the ships over.

Towing took some time, however it was preferable for sailors to sail around the Peloponnese. Besides, they had the opportunity to visit the famous fornications of the time, the “sanctuaries of Aphrodite”.

Thousands of prostitutes lived in Corinth at that time, as in Acrocorinth there was a sanctuary in honor of the Goddess Of Love, which Medea had built. The sailors who made a stop in Corinth did not fail to visit the brothels of the area. For this reason, there was a rumor that those who chose to drag the boats ashore actually wished to visit the brothels.

And a cheesy song here:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2EC96IG0Bc&list=RDB2EC96IG0Bc&start_radio=1

Women as literal godesses.

We've been saying that Blue Pillers pedestalise women. I don't think that the notion has sunk deep enough - and that has certainly been the case for me, in the past.

Religion is a symbolic expression of the internalized image of a parent. We think of God as "our father", and, as far as internal representations are concerned, that's not even metaphorical. He loves, is always present, guides, forgives, or is even fearsome. Just like dad.

Now, the point I want to make is that a Blue Piller might be a convinced atheist, and even an accomplished world-renowned positivist scientist. However, when the notion of woman (i.e. the internal representation of his mother) enters the discussion, his rationality is cancelled and all his higher cognitive functions are subdued, to be taken over by his sense of utter dread, his infantile fear of annihilation due to his mother being unchecked by his father, and ready to consume him, her child.

I believe the source of this dread is extremely ancient, animalistic, from the age that female animals literally ate their runts.

The illustrating case, in my mind, is a scientist I greatly admire and respect, Robert Sapolsky. He's kind of the embodiment of an open-minded and dedicated scientist, complete with social consciousness. It all goes out the window when woman enters the picture.

I believe the above is the way to solve the nagging puzzle we may have when confronted with some modern, or even older, scientists. "He's so fucking brilliant, how can he not see women for what they are?" It's that his brilliance is suspended, and he's running on religious mode.