New Year thought for the …. uh… year:

Collectively we have an average of a few decades of life experience among us. And when we talk about blue pill vs red pill thinking, it is easy to forget one key thing. Perhaps THE most important thing ever.

Women have been lying in collusion with each other since the beginning of time.

We can give them a break by acknowledging that they “had to” because men in the past would kill them for infidelity, or any one of a number of other reasons.

But one thing remains crystal clear: women are natural born liars. On top of that, they have a strong in-group preference with and for other women.

One could write a paper on this topic or more. But the bottom line is that collectively, the lies that women have told have had perhaps the biggest impact on the trajectory of human history than any other single factor. Fuck citing sources, and fuck peer review (aka “gate keeping” aka “system approval”). We have the data sets now. We can determine for ourselves how to proceed from here.

To sum this all up, with my own biases clearly delineated here and throughout my body of work, I offer the following:

• Women have shaped the course of human history more than any ten wars put together.
• Women are not evil - they just exist as an entity, like sharks, mosquitoes, or bacteria. They play a role in any given ecosystem.
• Red pill content may be the most profound shift in consciousness than almost any other ideology, or religion that has ever existed. Think about Islam, the Catholic church, and Judaism - the Red Pill may be larger than all of these combined. It will just take a century or two to see results. Our ideas are new, but the mainstreaming of them IS new.
• Dealing with reality is almost always preferable to dealing in lies.

I’ll stop there.

Happy New Year my brothers. I wish you well in the coming year. It is shaping up to be a pretty interesting one.

Yours truly,

DD

@Chantfire

Switching between “alpha” and “beta” behaviours creates inconsistency because it reveals emotional reactivity. When things feel good, a man is calm and decisive. When uncertainty hits, he starts over-explaining, over-giving, or seeking reassurance. That’s not strategy; that’s fear leaking through behaviour.

Women don’t analyse this logically; they feel the instability. They don’t know which version of you they’ll get, and that kills polarity over time.

As we already know alpha isn’t being cold or dominant 24/7. It’s emotional self-control. Warm when you choose, silent when you choose, decisive regardless of outcome. No mood swings based on her responses.

If your behaviour changes based on validation or fear of loss, it’s not character, it’s performance. Masculinity is consistency under pressure, not switching masks.

Could you provide examples of the difference you've observed in alpha and beta behavior, and how you believe childhood trauma would influence their decision making?