@MentORPHEUS

Demeaning and marginalizing groups

Fat - Objectively true

Dyke - Objectively true

Psychotic - Undiagnosed, but it takes a mentally ill person to try to kill someone with a car.

Not one shred of marginalizing happened here. Perhaps a misdiagnosis of a mental illness. Nothing inherently evil about that.

to use as scapegoats

I did not see one word scapegoating anyone or anything.

to prop up state and party interests...

If my “state interests” you mean enforcing the current laws as written, then sure, it is a state interest. But it also happens to benefit society as a whole.

Fuck the slippery slope thing - we are well down that path already. When people start disobeying laws en masse, it is a MAJOR problem. If they start committing crimes in support of others who are also breaking the law, That is an even MORE massive problem. Then add to it the attempt to murder a federal law enforcement officer, and. you entire nation is in serious trouble.

To support that in any way shape or form is pure evil. You will have to ignore the rights, safety, and well being of countless men, women and children to take the stance you are taking.

right out of the playbook of the Nazi party, that tens of millions died fighting against in WWII.

And you throw the Nazi labels around? Methinks you should look in the mirror bro.

And before you toss that word around ever again, you need to call out Hollywood, Madison avenue, and the Democrat party for much worse and far more widespread application of Nazi propaganda techniques.

I hard disagree with the stance you're taking on this.

Then you lean hard left politically. There is nothing wrong with that. But you have to base your points on facts in a place like this, not your feelings or slogans they told you to say. Like “Nazi” “Himmler” etc.

Also keep in mind, when you invoke those things, one can see it as racism against Germans. Don’t be a dick and stop that shit. it’s wrong. Period.

Are you really accepting of murdering people when they are "just" fat dykes, or other outgroups?

Not one person said that. You are making shit up. You may be too far gone to help, but I’m trying here,

Also - according to Grok, Approximately 10-15% of the U.S. population fits the criteria of straight, white (non-Hispanic), male, and politically right-wing/conservative.

So who exactly is the “out” group here bud?

The days of all the decades old buzz words and propaganda came to an end about 5 years ago kiddo It’s over. You just didn’t get the message. GenZ laughs at labels and ideas like that.

I am starting to think they’re right. I am not a Nazi, but if I am called one I will take it as a badge of honor. It means my opponent lost the argument on its merits.

So tread carefully. You are lacking a HUGE pile of cultural awareness my friend.

@Typo-MAGAshiv It’s disingenuous to the extreme to

• Claim she didn’t hit him

• Ignore that she was fleeing from an order

I get not liking authority, I get wanting to protest against your political opponents and their motives, I get that she probably shouldn’t even be dead.

However, in order to even begin mitigating the gap between world views, @mentorpheus needs to at least observe the objective facts.

• American police are armed

• Vehicles are considered dangerous weapons

• She hit him

• She defied a stop order

• She was fleeing

Given all of these things are true there is a much greater than zero chance she winds up dead. She was too stupid to fathom the sandbox she decided to play in and she got the worst outcome for her actions. She had plenty of steps between life and death and she rejected them all.

Moralising it, virtue signalling it, turning it to a progressive/punk/resistance narrative is retarded - like her.

His reluctance to even bother grappling with these objective facts tells me all I need to know, and the discussion shouldn’t be coerced into being anything other than a stupid woman dying in a monumentally stupid way.