RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
Not sure. I mean many fools are useful and kept around for that reason and also I'm sure plenty of fools had parents who foolishly didn't wrap it or anything, hence why they exist at all. Fools are a necessary cog in society so they'll end up reproducing and allowed to
I'm not sure as for the machiavellianism. I don't think a fool is capable of the tactic and foresight for it. So I think it inherently requires intelligence as a pre-requsite as is.
I'd argue machiavellianism has more of a need to combat other savvy people, rather than mere fools. It's particularly useful on arrogants like shortsighted narcissists
@Vermillion-Rx That was good.
I don't think this is a tangent, but it made me consider a perspective I hadn't had before. Darwinism, we all know that those that survive have favourable traits, sexual selection etc etc. Well I'd never factored the mind in to that, cause y'know, physical traits help domination on the material plane. Is intelligence a genetic trait, anyhow? Machiavellian traits and methods of mental survival could develop in intelligent individuals to counter an increasingly stupid population.
@Adam-l I think that's your ball park, any substance to that?
@SwarmShawarma My Wang, too, wonders if it is possible to allow women to have their period every three months.
It dawned on mean through self medication (marijuana, booze and other recreational narcotics) and doctor prescribed psych meds, that over 50% of the USA is on drugs daily.
Yes, naturally, intelligence is a product of evolution.
I believe the dimension of machiavellianism is independent of intelligence (re @Vermillion-Rx). It has to do with using other humans, as opposed of using nature. So, if human society is considered something positive, machiavellianism is basically parasitism. It's a strategy.
You can have stupid machiavellians. You see them everywhere. They try this and that small con. They eventually end up playing only with other stupids, because a smart guy figures them out.
Something I, and others, have been pondering, is the natural limit to intelligence. There's this unsolvable problem, death, for which there isn't a solution. We basically deal with it deceiving ourselves in a way or another. A bit too intelligent, and you might lose that capability, making you insane. The mad genius archetype, the bright kid who ends up with schizophrenia, etc.
And something that I have been pondering, is another problem of the same magnitude as death: realizing that your mother is not protective, but is taking advantage of you. The devouring mother is probably another route through which bright kids end up mentally unstable.
Read MoreHitler's obsession was against Marxists (which he conflated with Jews), and he specifically declared that they had nothing to do with these kind of socialists.
Now, I’m not talking to the veracity of his claims, but in Mein Kampf, Hitler talks at length about the Bolshevik’s influence on the German war effort during WW1.
Now if you think there’s anything in the historical claims of the Bolshevik revolution actually being a Jewish revolution, then the tantalising thread would be the jews subsequently demoralising Germany, pushing the culture of the Weimar Republic and even negotiated the treaty of Versailles between themselves.
I digress slightly, but the throughline is that Marxists are a jewish ideology. Again, I don’t make any claims of my own as to the veracity of the truth in that.
Anyway, all that being said, I figure a revulsion reaction to “socialism” is a deeply ingrained cultural phenomenon of Americans. I don’t mean that in an antagonistic sense, just that I find Americans the most difficult to have a pragmatic or even utilitarian discussion on socialist policy. I can’t even propose it to them with an ethnic agenda!
Read MoreAha. So the Marxist Jews had been lying through their teeth the whole time, arguing against the creation of a Jewish state and for internationalist solidarity, so that others would forego their national identity and they, the Jews, would setup their own state instead.
Diabolical.
/s
