@Durek_The_Bald I fear you are conflating red pill with "what you would like to emulate"

Red pill is a world view -one that aims to see to the truth behind what the western gynocentric "system" teaches / indoctrinates. Red pill is essentially seeking the truth. A wise man then acts on that truth he has found to aim to make his life better. The truth can be seen by a large range of people -in fact any man with a questioning mind and objective thought- and acted on by then all in slightly different ways.

Many come to question established thought through suffering. Some get there just because they are inquisitive but most have to have some intrusion of uncomfortable truth break through the blue pill illusion to realise the extent of the blue pill fallacy.

This has meant that red pill is a very wide church with many hurt and malcontent members, a fair number of misfits too. These are the the men who drive the groundswell of revolutions. Revolutionary leaders come in all shapes but when the revolution consolidates into the establishment, then the kind of leaders people want are establishment types -people you would probably like to be or at least emulate. Then all the misfits and malcontents need to go back into the shadows.

Right now, however we are in the revolution. Its a free for all. Truths can be used by anyone for their won purpose and their own propaganda. During the revolution bunches of people who would never normally get along fight shoulder to shoulder.

There are many who have seen far in this world and have shown great truths but would you like to walk in their shoes. Who would be Isaac Newton for example (strange virgin nerd who did a lot of calculations)? We admire Newton, we use his truths but would we ever want to walk in his shoes? Same is true for many of the great thinkers.

@Durek_The_Bald

Here are a few thoughts:

1. This.

"If you don't have genuinely enjoyable sexual/romantic relationships with women, you are not red pill.?

This is gate keeping. Don’t do that.

1. What Red Pill means can vary by person, but there is no sort of manifestation of it. Saying “red pill is this” or whatever, it like saying “the facts should make you feel like x, y, z”. It just doesn’t work that way.

2. Look at the red pill like a library. it is a curated collection of information. What you get from it will depend on how many books you have read. In terms of Red Pill thinking, it is a matter of content, experience, background, age, life stage, and a bunch of other things.

There is no such thing as “red pill is this” or “that”.

Stop AMOGing, and stop gate keeping. I hated r/theredpill for that very reason. A bunch of (apparently) young men trying to AMOG the sub because they read Roissy/Heartiste .

Finally…

< If I wouldn't want to walk in your shoes, your insights and advice mean nothing.

I don’t know you well, other than your content here. So Why should anyone trust YOU?

Have a good day!

Random Sunday Thought:

One of my biggest fears is that my inner violent “guy” takes over.

More than a few times in my life I was confronted with threats of violence. Let’s say many times.

And past 9th grade, I only lost one of about a dozen fights.

All the other times, I got scared. I felt threatened by another man, and I reacted. But the question is, did “I” react?

The way it felt to me was an almost instantaneous feeling that some other dude inside me pushed “me” aside and said “My turn” and I violently beat that person to the ground in an ugly scary way. When I say it was like being in a trance, or an out of body experience, I mean it.

My regular decent dude self was like, “Ok. I’m going to go to sleep now. Don’t make us pay for this”

And the “other” me showed up.

I had very little control over that switch. I felt scared and the whole “fight or flight” thing hit me. And I hate flight. At least that “other dude” does. He has control of that world.

I know how this can sound. But I am not a badass, a Navy Seal, or anything of the sort. But I am a man who, when confronted with fear, is the sort to kill the threat. For now.

I fear that one day, some man on the street or in a bar will make me feel that way again, and the next time I will not be able to control other dude.

Have a good night!

Don’t forget to tip your waitresses and bartenders.

@SwarmShawarma

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fx1XD01s-_0

For more than half a century, Professor Mordechai Kedar has studied Arabic language, Islamic texts and Middle Eastern political culture from the inside. A former Israeli military intelligence officer and one of Israel’s most seasoned experts on Arab society, he has spent decades listening to what the region says in its own words, not through Western translations or assumptions.

In this far reaching conversation with Jonathan Sacerdoti, Kedar argues that the West’s greatest failure is not moral but interpretive. Immigration, Islam and integration, he says, are routinely analysed through liberal democratic frameworks that simply do not apply. Drawing on history, theology and direct engagement with the region, he explains why migration has a radically different meaning inside Islamic thought, why movements like the Muslim Brotherhood see Western societies themselves as occupied space, and why democracy is not a shared universal ideal.