I think you have put this more concisely than I could have. this is a good comment. If we disregard these guys as "incels" or low value losers then we are ignoring the canary in the coal mine.
The canary dies first because it is weakest. When the canary dies, you know there is a problem. These guys are in the same messed up continuum we are, they are just closer to the fire burning a hole in men's oportunities and happiness today.
Just because the weakest links are breaking does not mean we should not be understanding them or caring about them even if we do not want to emulate them. They have a contribution to make.
Personally I don't really like this praxeology thing anyway. It flies (at least in interpretation) a bit close to "Lived experience" which is a woolly notion the left hides behind for needing special treatment, cancelling and deplatforming people. I want to look for objective measurable reality.
A praxeology studies intentional behaviour (regardless of outcome I might note) and not unconscious and reflexive behaviour. Actually a lot of what we talk about is unintentional and reflexive and where we use intent it is often with the ultimate aim of changing a lived experience to create better reflexive and unintentional behaviour. (like how young men of low status view themselves and interact with women, so they can have more happiness and success).
I am not really happy with the notion of us being a praxeology and would be glad to debate it with anyone who would like.
There is a reality out there. Our aim is to objectively measure it. and act on what we find. If you want to go with "lived experience" I am cool with that so long as every man is a sensor in the array of lived experience. If we don't like how uncalibrated some sensors are, its very hard to say who is right and who is wrong because we all have a subjective assessment of reality.
Sorry to others that is this my only reply to date for a while. Just been a bit busy and its a good topic and deserves a good answer. I just thought Carnold had a good point here that was worth highlighting. These low status men are part of the whole situation and should not be disregarded or silenced because they have not been approved by being worthy of women's love.
"There is no fundamental difference between the godless communist Left-Liberal and the Churchian zionist Right-Conservative, as they accept fundamentally the same precepts and principles and differ only in how those precepts and principles are best applied."
― Voxday, *Source
Live your life, man. That's way more important than us bunch of internet nobodies. Besides, the idea that lack of wealth or status denies males the opportunity to get laid is a comically retarded fallacy. Where there is a will, there is a way.
As far as Elliot Rodger goes, Canaries don't go into coal mines willingly, nor do they arm themselves to murder their closest friends. Just as the media intelligentsia vilified him, so too did many of the manosphere dismiss his kind, which confirmed how dis-genuine and insincere highly visible pro-male personalities have always ever been. It's vastly more cost effective for the agents of the elite to control public sentiment through internet "influencers", than through newspapers, periodicals, tv, radio, or film, and I'm concerned most people are willfully ignorant to this fact.
I've scrutinized enough history to know that when you deny large groups of men the love of community, they'll have nothing to lose should they decide to follow-through and put the community to the torch if only for the sake of feeling some kind of warmth. I find it unsettling is that I understand this is one of many potential outcomes that loom on the horizon and none of them particularly frighten me.
Read MoreMight does indeed make right, and all of the post-modernist gnashing of teeth over moralising and charity will be quashed by empirical evidence.
It's been bothering, so let me ask you. Real question.
Are you aware of the consequence the solidifying of this position will have? Namely, that Americans won't be able to travel safely through the world? They will practically be imprisoned in their own country for their own safety.
That's no theoretical hypothesis, it's what is actually happening with the citizens of another country which I will not name, that overwhelmingly support their government's aggressive expansionism.
Anyone else feel like they're not made for the 9-5 life?
I'm in my mid 20s in north america now working corporate in the tech field for a few years making between 100 - 200k. The 9 - 5 life bores me. I've been diagnosed with ADHD around a year ago and have been taking meds when I want to focus. It helps. But it still doesn't motivate me to care about the company goals, performance, vision etc. I see my coworkers talking about the company performance every few months and it bores me. I just go to work and do the bare minimum.
Sometimes I find myself catching up on missed work because during work hours I'm thinking about other things. I like creating apps, websites, and other things that I see a direct impact on the community from. I like side hustles. I like socializing and doing my hobbies. I can focus on things I like when I want to solve a problem. I want to build something of my own and not work for someone else.
Anyone else had a similar experience? What did you do?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrjylHI-zwU
This is a tiresome non-issue guys constantly feel some need to whine about as if anyone cares.
Shut up, work your job, repay your debts, build up your savings, and maintain a list of the things you actually want to do with your life where you will regularly see it. When you're ready, resign from your job and move on to something else from the position of F.U.
Read MoreThe Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics: How Conservatism and Liberalism Evolved Within Humans
Why do people adopt different political ideologies? How can seemingly equal intellects, presented with the same facts and circumstances disagree so vehemently over how society should be structured? What psychological undercurrents guide people to adopt Conservative or Liberal political beliefs, and where did they come from?
The answer lies in a well known concept in biology, termed r/K Selection Theory. r/K Theory examines how all populations tend to adopt one of two psychologies as a means of adapting their behavior to the presence or absence of environmental resources. The two strategies, termed r and K, each correlate perfectly with the psychologies underlying Liberalism and Conservatism.
One strategy, named the r-strategy, imbues those who are programmed with it to be averse to all peer on peer competition, embrace promiscuity, embrace single parenting, and support early onset sexual activity in youth. Obviously, this mirrors the Liberal philosophy’s aversion to individual Darwinian competitions such as capitalism and self defense with firearms, as well as group competitions such as war. Likewise, Liberalism is tolerant of promiscuity, tolerant of single parenting, and more prone to support early sex education for children and the sexualization of cultural influences. Designed to exploit a plethora of resources, one will often find this r-type strategy embodied within prey species, where predation has lowered the population’s numbers, and thereby increased the resources available to it’s individuals.
The other strategy, termed the K-strategy, imbues those who pursue it with a fierce competitiveness, as well as tendencies towards abstinence until monogamy, two-parent parenting, and delaying sexual activity until later in life. Obviously, this mirrors Conservatism’s acceptance of all sorts of competitive social schemes, from free market capitalism, to war, to individuals owning and carrying private weapons for self defense. Conservatives also tend to favor abstinence until monogamy, two parent parenting with an emphasis upon “family values,” and children being shielded from any sexualized stimuli until later in life. This strategy is found most commonly in species which lack predation, and whose population’s have grown to the point individuals must compete with each other for the limited environmental resources that they are rapidly running out of.
Meticulously substantiated with the latest research in fields from neurobiology to human behavioral ecology, this work offers an unprecedented view into not just what governs our political battles, but why these battles have arisen within our species in the first place. From showing how these two strategies adapt in other more complex species in nature, to examining what genetic and neurostructural mechanisms may produce these divergences between individuals, to showing what this theory indicates our future may hold, this work is the most thorough analysis to date of just why we have two political ideologies, why they will never agree, and why we will tend to become even more partisan in the future.
You can find mention of this book on both Youtube, Scribd, and other websites including your preferred pirate media site.
#2017 #TheEvolutionaryPsychologyBehindPolitics #AnonymousConservative #Books #eBooks #Faith #Christianity #World #US #America #Kselection #Good #VS #Evil #rselection #CultureWar #EconomicWar #PsychologicalWarfare #SpiritualWarfare #BiologicalWarfare #BureaucraticWarfare #KineticWarfare #UnrestrictedWarfare #Demoralization #IdeologicalSubversion #Promiscuity #Predditors #Grooming #Homosexuality #SamesexAttracted #Sodomites #Pedophiles #Noncery #Pederasty #Pedophocracy #GenderDysphoria #PopulationControl #Politics #Rightism #Leftism #Conservative #Labour #Liberal #Libertarian #RepublicanParty #DemocraticParty #Uniparty #DualParty #Ideology #Egalitarianism #Atheism #Tribalism #Nationalism #Populism #Marxism #Feminism #Socialism #Fascism #Zionism #Internationalism #Communism #Humanism #Globohomo #Globalism #Paganism #Freemasonry #RabbinicalJudaism #Judeochristianity #Satanism #MentalIllness #MoralIllness
Read More
which and avoid ever considering the first (dishonourable) type as trustworthy. The think compliance is honour.
This slippery slope, however, leads to things like both the Neolib Biden Administration, and the Neocon Trump administration.
Putting a standard of group honor above individuals' own standards and ethics, isn't something I'm throwing my support behind.
@adam-l luxury beliefs exist out of luxury but a luxury hotel loses a lot of glamour when the power goes out.
If TRP is praxeology, then the state of a man's red pill journey can only be judged from where he's actually at in real, lived terms. If all his theoretical knowledge only brought him to a place of perpetual resentment, schadenfreude, victimhood, and a need to complain about everything under the sun, then either the theory is wrong, or he hasn't demonstrated that is has actionable value.
While that's an interesting idea, have you ever considered that the guys you've noticed who're completely unable to advance beyond the anger stage of grief after taking the red pill might simply be Gamma's?
@Stigma this sounds so much like the exhilaration of the masses at the outbreak of WWI.
My worry is exactly that more wealth and continuing dominance will mean even more luxurious living for the overlords of US society.
The women.
Meaning they'll be able to sit on ther fat asses and doom scroll much more, as well as put longer and girthier cucumbers up their vaginas for their OnlyFans patrons to view while jerking off.