The Official Narrative about the Kirk Shooting. Is FULL of holes.

Over the weekend, a spokesman for TPUSA tried to fill one, using male bovine excrement.

“I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital... He said the bullet ‘absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high powered, high velocity round. I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc’.

“But it didn’t go through. Charlie’s body stopped it.” The surgeon who tried to save Charlie Kirk's life described a 'miracle' (Joe Raedle/Getty Images) The surgeon who tried to save Charlie Kirk's life described a 'miracle' (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

He added: “I mentioned to his doctor that there were dozens of staff, students, and special guests standing directly behind Charlie on the other side of the tent, and he replied: ‘it was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed. His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. It likely would have killed those standing behind him too

Countless hunters, veterans, retired Seal snipers, have released videos doubting the claim that he was shot by the weapon officially claimed. They provided plenty of examples of what happens to an animal, ballistic gel head etc that gets stuck by a 30.06 round. They stood unanimous saying that the official story does not match what is shown in numerous video angles of the event, and what the inside of the white tent and all the people to Charlie's rear would have looked like.

Forum members who hunt, and who have fired a 30.06 rifle, what does your firsthand experience tell you about the plausibility of the official narrative?

Another very unusual set of videos from multiple angles that I've seen: rather than the crime scene getting cleared out and locked down immediately, several men are shown moving, gathering, and removing objects from the immediate vicinity! A man wearing a white baseball cap is shown moving the very chair Charlie was sitting in, then STANDING ON IT to take down a camera that was filming Charlie from above.

@universitythrowaway

Screening for logistics on first date and when to not attempt to f close?

Been recently going to get drinks on first dates. I’m living with my family again after living alone at university so my place is out of the question. A lot of girls around my age range are also living with their parents too until they plan to move out.

What tips do you use to screen for logistics on the first date?

My last date went with drinks -> flirting -> asked her to watch a movie we were talking about at her house -> she said she lives with her parents still -> car make out -> tried to escalate more but she wanted to go slower. As you can see this is not ideal and I would prefer to not hook up in a car anymore.

I have another first date coming up with similar logistics she lives with her parents and we’re getting drinks near her place.

To answer my question I have two solutions

1. Follow the same steps and see if she’s willing to invite me back to her parents house
   • If not suggest a hotel we can go to
2. Don’t attempt to f close on the first date. I’ve heard some people saying this increases the chances of the second date lay, this would also make it easier to invite her to a hotel the next date

Hotels or air bnb not an option? Don't act like a schnook, study the book.